Names should be cute, not descriptive
ntietz.com
Names should be cute, not descriptive
1–10 of 498 posts
Re: Names should be cute, not descriptive
#2Re: Names should be cute, not descriptive
#3Re: Names should be cute, not descriptive
#4When someone gets onboarded, they'll encounter these names and will have to ask. It's a short anecdote, and it sticks. I'm personally a fan of these, as long as the stretch isn't too far. Themes around names can be nice, too. (As with the above, Mr. Roger's Neighborhood.)
Re: Names should be cute, not descriptive
#5Re: Names should be cute, not descriptive
#6That way, the physical identity remains steady, but the responsibilities (CNAME) can move around (usually because of upgrade)
Re: Names should be cute, not descriptive
#7Re: Names should be cute, not descriptive
#8[flagged]
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34271510
> Internet socialists / communists / transhumanists seem to infuse their content with a “chibi” vibe, filled with cuteness and hearts. Disagree with them politically, though, and watch out. The sunshine and roses suddenly become bloody slavering fangs.
Re: Names should be cute, not descriptive
#9At work we tend to create backronyms for/from the cute names which is our way of having our cake and eating it too.
[0] https://youtube.com/watch?v=y8OnoxKotPQ&si=EnSIkaIECMiOmarE
Re: Names should be cute, not descriptive
#10Cute names are a nightmare when a company has accumulated hundreds of quirkily named things that you have to memorize just to navigate through the basics of trying to get your job done.
New hires suffer the most. It’s an extra layer of company-specific jargon that you have to learn to even begin to understand what your peers are talking about.