Live data from Hacker News

The number of banks willing to do business with the crypto industry is shrinking

barrons.com

11–20 of 362 posts

Re: The number of banks willing to do business with the crypto industry is shrinking

#13
A worrisome title.

https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20230109005186/en/

The Company expects minimal financial impact from the exit of this vertical. MCB currently has four active institutional crypto-asset related clients that in the aggregate currently account for approximately 1.5% of total revenues and 6% of total deposits. MCB’s relationships with these clients are limited to providing debit card, payment and account services.

The Company has no loans outstanding to any of these clients, does not hold crypto-assets on its balance sheet and does not market or sell crypto-assets to its customers.

Mark R. DeFazio, President and CEO of MCB. “Crypto-related clients, assets and deposits have never represented a material portion of the Company’s business and have never exposed the Company to material financial risks.

Seems like this experiment never brought anything but account maintenance fees and they simply revised regulatory risks after FTX noise. A “deep liquidity” which was left unused for years.

But “Banks Are Fleeing” makes a better headline indeed.

Re: The number of banks willing to do business with the crypto industry is shrinking

#15

If I were a bank, I'd stay far away from any non-bitcoin cryptos that I'm not an issuer of. Why would I want to own a coin that someone else is able to freely devalue, in addition to conventional currencies? On the other hand, if I were a bank, bitcoin presents a compelling argument. The supply is finite. Disclaimer: I don't own any crypto or bitcoin.

>if I were a bank, bitcoin presents a compelling argument. The supply is finite.

Do you think that the most important thing about the value of something is the finite supply of it?

Fiat currency is theoretically infinite since we abolished the gold standard, but seems to be compelling.

Why would bitcoin be more compelling than gold (a finite store of wealth) or fiat currency (a fluctuating/volatile/infinite store of wealth)

Re: The number of banks willing to do business with the crypto industry is shrinking

#19
post #15

If I were a bank, I'd stay far away from any non-bitcoin cryptos that I'm not an issuer of. Why would I want to own a coin that someone else is able to freely devalue, in addition to conventional currencies? On the other hand, if I were a bank, bitcoin presents a compelling argument. The supply is finite. Disclaimer: I don't own any crypto or bitcoin.

>if I were a bank, bitcoin presents a compelling argument. The supply is finite. Do you think that the most important thing about the value of something is the finite supply of it? Fiat currency is theoretically infinite since we abolished the gold standard, but seems to be compelling. Why would bitcoin be more compelling than gold (a finite store of wealth) or fiat currency (a fluctuating/volatile/infinite store of…

You can own both gold and Bitcoin. At a minimum unless you think those who think bitcoin is ultimately worthless are right, it’s a way to diversify a gold-like asset class along the axis they are similar.

Re: The number of banks willing to do business with the crypto industry is shrinking

#20
post #8
post #6

[flagged]

I’m not going to pretend Bitcoin is the bane of human existence, I have a hunch that a majority of the people cheering Bitcoin’s (alleged) rise either is a fraudster or a grifter.

I see what you did there. Agree to disagree, I suppose.
Post reply on HN