21–30 of 147 posts
I cant wait for GPT to be added to a DAO. Imagine the dao setting objectives and the chat gpt generating the communication. Wage negotiations with a machine..
I cant wait for GPT to be added to a DAO. Imagine the dao setting objectives and the chat gpt generating the communication. Wage negotiations with a machine..
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Did you look at the results? All models that were tested failed significantly (10%+) to acheive the passing range.
Project to the next 10 years given the trends.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
So I'm going to put a laptop on the stand when I go to trial? Give me a break.
If it could build a case better than a human, you would. But currently it's nowhere close to that
Potentially in ~100 years you could have two AIs sort out the cases. If you can't afford a really good AI to defend you, you can use the public-defender-AI which is trained on the same dataset as the prosecutor-AI. Only involve humans on appeal. It sounds dystopian but I can't see why not to do it, in most simpler cases it's a waste of a human to repeat the same argument for the hundredth time. There's already things…
The next ten years will be very interesting.
It's definitely not a linear progress.
Potentially in ~100 years you could have two AIs sort out the cases. If you can't afford a really good AI to defend you, you can use the public-defender-AI which is trained on the same dataset as the prosecutor-AI. Only involve humans on appeal. It sounds dystopian but I can't see why not to do it, in most simpler cases it's a waste of a human to repeat the same argument for the hundredth time. There's already things…
If we put an AI in the role of the judge/attorneys, we will come up against "ah but the robot didn't do this thing that a human would do" and a lot of people would be convinced that the result was illegitimate. Not necessarily wrong, but without the legitimacy conferred by being done by a human being.
It would require our social system to turn over some decisions that have been done by a very protected sector of society (legal people) to newbies coming from the tech world. "This is the correct sentence because random forest says so" is going to ring hollow to a lot of people.
I cant wait for GPT to be added to a DAO. Imagine the dao setting objectives and the chat gpt generating the communication. Wage negotiations with a machine..
As long as GPT is just a fancy bullshit generator that is able to make up convincing looking facts without having to worry about repercussions I will not trust its reasoning.
The next ten years will be very interesting.
If you're alluding to the notion "AI will take ALL the jobs!", well, here I am, still building websites for well established companies that still don't (in 2023!!!) have a web presence. Hell, half the worlds banking system still runs on COBOL! Leading edge tech development is rapid, sure. But tech understanding, adoption, and implementation is painfully slow. Humans gon' be humans. It's like the same thing every 5 ye…
The potential with Chatgpt if it can be refined is wild.