I always wondered why DarkSky was so popular. Was it the design? It was known to be generally inaccurate among meteorologists, while other apps (METAR+TAF especially) would be remarkably accurate. I don't intend this to be a jab at anyone's app preferences, but I'm very interested in the value proposition that hooked people.
Ask HN: DarkSky Alternatives?
21–30 of 57 posts
Re: Ask HN: DarkSky Alternatives?
#22https://forecast.weather.gov/MapClick.php?FcstType=graphical...
I've become a fan of personal weather stations but of course if you are traveling that doesn't work (unless a startup wants to put a weather station into a phone/watch somehow)
Re: Ask HN: DarkSky Alternatives?
#23Seems like the apple weather app is updated? seems to 'just work' at this point :-)
Re: Ask HN: DarkSky Alternatives?
#24https://www.weather.gov/ NOAA is where most of the other US-based weather services are getting their data from anyway. Why go to a secondary source when the primary source is free?
Re: Ask HN: DarkSky Alternatives?
#25Re: Ask HN: DarkSky Alternatives?
#26Ventusky
Re: Ask HN: DarkSky Alternatives?
#27Has been mostly good, where DarkSky never really worked in Europe.
Re: Ask HN: DarkSky Alternatives?
#28I always wondered why DarkSky was so popular. Was it the design? It was known to be generally inaccurate among meteorologists, while other apps (METAR+TAF especially) would be remarkably accurate. I don't intend this to be a jab at anyone's app preferences, but I'm very interested in the value proposition that hooked people.
It was also a true "indie" project with 2 (3?) guys with no relevant background deciding to tackle an annoyance in their own lives. They did it and it happened to work well. They did a kickstarter. Then they tried being aggressive with the growth and it didn't go so well.
Also their dataviz was really pretty. That helped.
Re: Ask HN: DarkSky Alternatives?
#29I always wondered why DarkSky was so popular. Was it the design? It was known to be generally inaccurate among meteorologists, while other apps (METAR+TAF especially) would be remarkably accurate. I don't intend this to be a jab at anyone's app preferences, but I'm very interested in the value proposition that hooked people.
In rainy parts of the US such as the Pacific North West coast, having a thirty minute warning that it's about to rain is really handy. It can make the difference between biking home sopping wet or squeezing in between two downbursts of rain. The rest of the app was fine, but not great. It demanded constant attention as its "predictions" changed constantly.
I live in Scotland, a famously rainy country. We line dry our laundry outside and dark sky alerted me take it indoors before rain for years.
Then Apple took it away and my laundry regularly gets rained on.
The closest I've found for this functionality on Android is Rain Alarm. It has two flaws though. One is that it uses public rain radar data that only updates every 15 mins, so often you get an alert when its already started raining. The second is that it uses a circular search path, so you get false positive rain alerts that it's raining 3km away when that rain shower is actually passing by and will not hit us.
For these features Dark Sky was unique and accurate enough.
Re: Ask HN: DarkSky Alternatives?
#30I was comparing many data sources over many weeks and my results in Prague were Aeris weather most accurate (least false positives/negatives for rain), then gap and Foreca and MET Norway same and then big gap and you have very bad sources like Dark Sky, AccuWeather, Weatherbit and Open weather which are unusable.
As for the mobile apps on Android I use Weawow (has all 3 most accurate sources) and Today Weather (no Aeris, but had Foreca and MET Norway).
I'd recommend these two apps and comparing sources for few weeks to find out which one is the most accurate for your location, because accuracy varies across different locations, so there won't be single correct universal answer what you should use.