All the whoopla was about raising some capital and we all once again dutifully amplified the pitch
ChatGPT won’t replace search engines any time soon
321–330 of 427 posts
Re: ChatGPT won’t replace search engines any time soon
#322Earlier quoted context omitted.
EDIT: Nah that's not it. It's way too old. And in mine the police crash for no reason before they even get anywhere near the scene of the crime. I will skim thru it, but it doesn't look like the right setting. The movie was some generic action movie for some reason I remember Denzel Washington being in it but I looked through his movies from 2006-2012 and didn't find it. It was around that time. Setting had to be som…
can you recall anything else about the movie? its not a lot to go on if its not a major plot point
Literally all I remember is one scene where a bunch of cop cars or vans get dispatched for some reason like someone's about to die or a heist is happening, something of that nature. They all crash and roll over and wipe out on normal traffic roads for absolutely no reason, and the movie isn't even a comedy, just a generic action movie.
I can't remember one single thing other thing about it, not even the plot.
I do remember an urban setting.
Re: ChatGPT won’t replace search engines any time soon
#323For me, Google Search just doesn't seem to be getting better over the years, if anything its getting worse. I honestly feel like its hard to get what I want half the time with all the SEO spam, most of the time I have to input "inurl:reddit.com" just to get good results. At the same time, ChatGPT has frequently impressed me, not with everything (my expectations are reasonably low) but it has performed amazing work fo…
I know this thread is about ChatGPT, but if you're still using Google then I suggest giving Kagi a try. It's a paid search engine, but I've been using it for quite a while now and really enjoy it. With Kagi you can rank and downrank domains as well as block them. There's also this think called "lenses" which are basically filters for specific kinds of searches. For instance, I have a "Programming" lens and a "Academi…
"I suggest giving Kagi a try. It's a paid search engine"
I dont like the idea of linking my search queries with credit card.
Re: ChatGPT won’t replace search engines any time soon
#324Earlier quoted context omitted.
Really? I'd +1 for kagi too. But I have 2 problems with it. The first is the load speed. Sometimes it just takes so long that I just repeat my search to Google, especially on phones. By long I meant a few second so it's not that bad. Just long enough that I lose patience. I'm not sure if it's issues with my connection since I rarely go to Google nowadays. But I never felt the same problem with Google. In case you're…
Kagi has a private session token feature that you can use to carry on searching in private window (also a browser extension that does this automatically).
But still you have to be log in with your account that is linked with your credit card.
Re: ChatGPT won’t replace search engines any time soon
#325For me, Google Search just doesn't seem to be getting better over the years, if anything its getting worse. I honestly feel like its hard to get what I want half the time with all the SEO spam, most of the time I have to input "inurl:reddit.com" just to get good results. At the same time, ChatGPT has frequently impressed me, not with everything (my expectations are reasonably low) but it has performed amazing work fo…
> For me, Google Search just doesn't seem to be getting better over the years, if anything its getting worse. I honestly feel like its hard to get what I want half the time with all the SEO spam... Agreed, it's horrible and annoying. How are others doing improved searches?
Re: ChatGPT won’t replace search engines any time soon
#326Maybe, but its articles have been replacing my search results.
Re: ChatGPT won’t replace search engines any time soon
#327Yesterday my wife mentioned she was looking for a book with a summary of Hong Kong history. I asked ChatGPT and it spit out a list of 5 books, authors, and short descriptions. Like much of ChatGPT's output, it appeared authoritative but was complete bunk. The books weren't real. The authors were names of real people, and in some cases actual scholars. But the list was useless.
Re: ChatGPT won’t replace search engines any time soon
#328Earlier quoted context omitted.
Same feeling, the other day I spent just too much time trying to find a chart comparing Messi against Ronaldinho. I mean two of the greatest players ever, how is it possible that I couldn’t find a good page, tons of SEO garbage pages.
Is this a good chart? First result for “Messi vs. Ronaldinho stats” https://fbref.com/en/stathead/player_comparison.cgi?show_for... Searching without stats had a lot of other stuff, but this was near top. And searching without stats shows broader potential interests.
I did check that table, the data is great, but the readability not so much (especially on mobile) the meaning of some column names was not clear (tooltip didn't work on mobile).
That's why I was looking for a chart (in the graphical sense), it amazed me that I didn't find one.
Re: ChatGPT won’t replace search engines any time soon
#329I can imagine the Algolia founders had a lot of questions from their investors...
Re: ChatGPT won’t replace search engines any time soon
#330But it can enhance them https://chatgpt4google.com