61–70 of 219 posts
Which would mean: 2 second up, pause 0 seconds, negative for 4 seconds, pause 0 seconds start again.
Adjusting the tempo is a big part of most advanced training schedules.
If you do any training beyond simple resistance training I feel like you would encounter the concept. It's very old.
From my personal experience, for the majority of people, I would recommend to stay away from classic body building weight trainning. I trainned that way for several years in my early twenties (back then, I was even a certified body bulding trainner) and the overload in my joints was a recipe for disaster + the kind of body I developed was disfunctional for activities other than weights themselves. The excercises I've…
I don't think a style of training is better than any other, people can get outstanding results or get injured in all types of practice - it all boils down to the program detail and the individual.
What works best for me in terms of maximizing wellness is low-volume (3x3 or 3x5), high intensity (but not too high) strength training with compound lifts, a few accessories (rotational, abs, rear delts, etc.), plus any cardio that's not heavy on the joints.
In weight training this is also referred to as "tempo" and can be expressed as a set of 4 numbers. Eg: 2 - 0 - 4 - 0 Which would mean: 2 second up, pause 0 seconds, negative for 4 seconds, pause 0 seconds start again. Adjusting the tempo is a big part of most advanced training schedules. If you do any training beyond simple resistance training I feel like you would encounter the concept. It's very old.
From my personal experience, for the majority of people, I would recommend to stay away from classic body building weight trainning. I trainned that way for several years in my early twenties (back then, I was even a certified body bulding trainner) and the overload in my joints was a recipe for disaster + the kind of body I developed was disfunctional for activities other than weights themselves. The excercises I've…
May I know what you are referring to as the "classic body building" exercises. To me the classic ones are squat, bench and deadlift. I am curious why you think it's a disaster.
How effective are push-ups as an average Joe's muscle exercise?
From light to heavy: Chinups, Shoulder press, Rows, Bench, Squat, Deadlift
Or, roughly, in calisthenics: Chins, shoulder push-ups, pull-ups, push-ups, squat, sit-ups.
Probably the most useful of these movements is deadlift, nothing will make throwing office furniture around more fun than the strength you can train with deadlifts. Front raising a TV off the wall is pretty cool, too.
How effective are push-ups as an average Joe's muscle exercise?
A set of gymnastic rings for 50USD is a great investment if you can find a good place to use them. I have a set that I take with me to the gym. Ring dips and push-ups are awesome pushing exercises. Ring dips especially put a lot of load on the chest in way that almost no other exercise does. Ring pull-ups and rows are great pull exercises. Rings allow you to do a lot of interesting movements and variations on these e…
How effective are push-ups as an average Joe's muscle exercise?
But I prefer normal sports (running, biking, soccer.. anything) when I can.
From my personal experience, for the majority of people, I would recommend to stay away from classic body building weight trainning. I trainned that way for several years in my early twenties (back then, I was even a certified body bulding trainner) and the overload in my joints was a recipe for disaster + the kind of body I developed was disfunctional for activities other than weights themselves. The excercises I've…
An amateur doing a standard squat, bench press, curl, deadlift etc. routine with manageable weights and good guidance/form is absolutely going to benefit from it. A quick, high intensity weight routine few times a week is probably the best lifestyle change you can make for long term health.