Live data from Hacker News

MT-Propeller 11 blade propeller delivers 15% increase in static thrust

mt-propeller.com

1–10 of 104 posts

Re: MT-Propeller 11 blade propeller delivers 15% increase in static thrust

#6
I'd imagine that, just like in other industries, there are tons of metrics (or counter-metrics) that are also important. Some that come to mind are efficiency, noise, vibration, cost, maintenance, stall characteristics, RPM requirements, weight, etc etc. From some fiddling with RC quads, I remember that increasing the number of blades does increase thrust, but at the cost of efficiency and several other parameters.

Re: MT-Propeller 11 blade propeller delivers 15% increase in static thrust

#8
post #4

Why are they only using odd numbers of blades?

Easier to balance; if everything is even, you need to balance two blades to counter one misbehaviour, and do so perfectly to avoid introducing new misbehaviours. (They’re prime for resonance reasons. I don’t remember what, specifically.)

Re: MT-Propeller 11 blade propeller delivers 15% increase in static thrust

#9
Kind of related: Do the same efficiency dynamics that apply to wind turbines apply to a fan providing propulsion? I.e. if a one-bladed fan is the most efficient for capturing wind, would it also be the most efficient airplane propeller or boat propeller? Obviously efficiency isn't the only consideration, but I am curious and I expect there's going to be some fan experts in this thread...
Post reply on HN