Maybe a class action possibility here?
Twilio’s toll fraud problem
111–120 of 221 posts
Re: Twilio’s toll fraud problem
#112Re: Twilio’s toll fraud problem
#113Email works fine, is more reliable, latency is fine, and it works across devices and on desktops.
Deduplicate your accounts some other way. Owning a bunch of phone numbers is (clearly, from the article) not a hurdle for attackers.
Re: Twilio’s toll fraud problem
#114We've been hit by this at work as well. We had to add CAPTCHA and a several other techniques to defend against this. How it works: 1. Attacker leases 1 or more premium rate numbers in an international country. - Attacker can lease a premium rate number for as little as $10/month - Typically, the attacker gets to keep 70% of the money generated by the premium rate number. 2. Attacker then finds companies with OTP (One…
Which seems like a super easy fix for Twilio to implement. Don't allow SMS to premium rate numbers. If they can identify the premium numbers for billing, they should be able to identify them for blocking.
Re: Twilio’s toll fraud problem
#115We've been hit by this exact issue, especially over the last month. We tried to mitigate as cleanly as possible for our users, adding one-time nounces to signup requests, adding rate-limiting rules, locking down regions, but we still faced an onslaught of tens of thousands of fraudulent signups per day. On our tier we don't have the ability to set block rules ourselves - it requires a support request that takes 2-3 d…
If you told Twilio to text a number and they text it, I don't see how Twilio is at fault. It would be valuable if they let you avoid texting premium numbers, but that's just a feature on top of the service they provide.
Re: Twilio’s toll fraud problem
#116Re: Twilio’s toll fraud problem
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Your only power to encourage them to fix this is to do the thing they're begging you not to: dispute the charges. I'd check their TOS to see if they offer some kind of arbitration option. As noted in other threads, triggering that process can be a surprisingly effective way to make someone from the company actually engage with the issue. Disputing the charges is always a nuclear option. They may never do business wi…
> Disputing the charges is always a nuclear option. They may never do business with you after that. This is something that I think needs to be regulated. I'm not saying that this should be the case for a company the size of Twilio, but I definitely think that a company the size of Apple/Google/Samsung should not be able to ruin your life because you had temerity to stand up to them and dispute a charge.
Re: Twilio’s toll fraud problem
#118We've been hit by this at work as well. We had to add CAPTCHA and a several other techniques to defend against this. How it works: 1. Attacker leases 1 or more premium rate numbers in an international country. - Attacker can lease a premium rate number for as little as $10/month - Typically, the attacker gets to keep 70% of the money generated by the premium rate number. 2. Attacker then finds companies with OTP (One…
Which seems like a super easy fix for Twilio to implement. Don't allow SMS to premium rate numbers. If they can identify the premium numbers for billing, they should be able to identify them for blocking.
https://www.twilio.com/blog/2015/08/introducing-max-price.ht...
Apparently a lot of people could really use that info.
Re: Twilio’s toll fraud problem
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
As a programmatic telephone company, they're a possible (but not really probable) base for fraudulent spam calls. With KYC, and the fact that Twilio requires you call from a number you control, fraudulent calls would be easy to trace back to a person who could be charged for the calls. Much better than status quo, where it's very difficult to get to the originating phone account, and if you could, it's probably not r…
Why should Twilio do this when nobody else does?
Re: Twilio’s toll fraud problem
#120Your service got hit with a ddos-style attack that translated into you using twilio to send lots of texts. This cost you a lot of money.
I don't see how this is categorically different than your kid "accidentally" buying movies on Amazon prime or something like that. No way a credit card company would accept a chargeback in that scenario.
Ultimately, you used their product in the intended way. Of course you're on the hook for the bill.