Amazon has raised the number of jobs it plans to cut 18,000
1–10 of 86 posts
Re: Amazon has raised the number of jobs it plans to cut 18,000
#2Re: Amazon has raised the number of jobs it plans to cut 18,000
#3Re: Amazon has raised the number of jobs it plans to cut 18,000
#4So, approximately 1% of its workforce.
The news industry is incredibly desperate for stories about layoffs it seems.
Re: Amazon has raised the number of jobs it plans to cut 18,000
#5So, approximately 1% of its workforce.
Re: Amazon has raised the number of jobs it plans to cut 18,000
#6So, approximately 1% of its workforce.
So in line with the amount of turnover each year anyways due to "rank and yank" policies, be it official or just the implicit result of management's actions. The news industry is incredibly desperate for stories about layoffs it seems.
I don't think this is an informed take. Amazon not only cancelled all hires but also increased the number of employees they want to fire. From the first time in the company's history, they explicitly announced they were going to fire people in a purely cost-cutting approach and in a way that was not tied to employee performance.
If anything, this signals that Amazon changed radically it's corporate strategy from a growth-oriented strategy to a consolidation one. This has strong implications on the company's revenue expectations.
Re: Amazon has raised the number of jobs it plans to cut 18,000
#7So, approximately 1% of its workforce.
Re: Amazon has raised the number of jobs it plans to cut 18,000
#8So, approximately 1% of its workforce.
Re: Amazon has raised the number of jobs it plans to cut 18,000
#9So, approximately 1% of its workforce.
If it's one percent, that makes me think it's an announcement designed to help the share price, or send a message to its workforce, since 1% is close to natural attrition of a few months, ie some sort of hiring freeze could achieve a similar thing.
Re: Amazon has raised the number of jobs it plans to cut 18,000
#10So, approximately 1% of its workforce.
So in line with the amount of turnover each year anyways due to "rank and yank" policies, be it official or just the implicit result of management's actions. The news industry is incredibly desperate for stories about layoffs it seems.