Earlier quoted context omitted.
Looking at the Reddit thread about this, there was some arguably racist stuff going on in his repo which could've been related to this suspension. I'm not sure whether this is the right way to handle such things (banning those specific repo's might be better), but it would be somewhat understandable.
[flagged]
Automatic1111's GitHub account suspended for "ToS violations" [restored]
41–50 of 500 posts
Re: Automatic1111's GitHub account suspended for "ToS violations" [restored]
#42Re: Automatic1111's GitHub account suspended for "ToS violations" [restored]
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
Looking at the Reddit thread about this, there was some arguably racist stuff going on in his repo which could've been related to this suspension. I'm not sure whether this is the right way to handle such things (banning those specific repo's might be better), but it would be somewhat understandable.
[flagged]
Re: Automatic1111's GitHub account suspended for "ToS violations" [restored]
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
That's a nice example of false accusations. Parenthesis are used for increasing the weights of some terms. See how he uses single, double or triple parenthesis on different words. It has nothing to do with the triple parenthesis jew thing.
Just ran
rg '\(\(\(.*\)\)\)'
in my projects directory and found many instances authored by me. Guess I should prioritize fixing these, or next time I'm the target of some controversy, someone will use these as evidence of my antisemitism.Re: Automatic1111's GitHub account suspended for "ToS violations" [restored]
#45The corporation may benefit from having unclear moderation policies, but this is not in the best interests of the users. If you don't agree, consider the possibility that the corporation's political views may change and your own beliefs could then be subject to moderation instead of those of "the other side."
Re: Automatic1111's GitHub account suspended for "ToS violations" [restored]
#46Re: Automatic1111's GitHub account suspended for "ToS violations" [restored]
#47Looks like relying on a centralised github isn't the most reliable choice. It's convenient, but if you don't want to be held ransom by Microsoft's decisions, then a self hosted repository has to be the way forwards.
Re: Automatic1111's GitHub account suspended for "ToS violations" [restored]
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, someone should invent a version control system that does not rely on some central entity but is actually distributed.
I know you're joking, but what I suppose would need to happen is for someone to also come up with ways to do federated code discovery, search, browsing and ways to show off contributions. For issues and PRs there's mailing lists, but it seems the young uns are appalled by that, so maybe that too.
Re: Automatic1111's GitHub account suspended for "ToS violations" [restored]
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Prior to its use as an antisemitic label or identifier, ((( screen name ))) had been used in online communities such as AOL to indicate that a user was "cyberhugging" the user with the specified screen name. Why are all the nice things ruined by bigots.
Just wait till you hear that some circles of the net think using pepe the frog is a racist dog whistle.
Re: Automatic1111's GitHub account suspended for "ToS violations" [restored]
#50Looks like relying on a centralised github isn't the most reliable choice. It's convenient, but if you don't want to be held ransom by Microsoft's decisions, then a self hosted repository has to be the way forwards.
Yeah, someone should invent a version control system that does not rely on some central entity but is actually distributed.