141–150 of 355 posts
I propose the title should be changed to “Salesforce decimates staff as part of restructuring”. :)
Maybe it's just the segment I'm in, but I feel like Salesforce was hiring pretty hard up until recently. They wouldn't be the only company to go from a hiring spree to layoffs that quickly over the last quarter. We really need to lock this absurdity down and increase severance requirements for large companies heavily. It's one thing to gamble risk for the company, it's something completely different to gamble employe…
If you do that companies will be more reluctant to hire, since they’ll have to factor in the risk of paying a hefty severance.
Where's the efficiency for employee or employer?
I propose the title should be changed to “Salesforce decimates staff as part of restructuring”. :)
Very well done! Is there a word for when you use a word in the excruciatingly correct way but are guaranteed to misguide 99% of the audience who reads it?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Huh. Romans invented stacked ranking.
It’s a bit more ironic than that —- at least according to to Wikipedia, they drew lots (I.e randomly) for the individual who was killed.
Maybe it's just the segment I'm in, but I feel like Salesforce was hiring pretty hard up until recently. They wouldn't be the only company to go from a hiring spree to layoffs that quickly over the last quarter. We really need to lock this absurdity down and increase severance requirements for large companies heavily. It's one thing to gamble risk for the company, it's something completely different to gamble employe…
Either that or they see something the rest of us don't when looking at economic data (a long recession).
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wouldn't that have the same problem? You'd need to break either down by cost of living area to solve it.
No because the revenue per employee multiple has the employee costs scaled on both sides of the ratio.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s a bit more ironic than that —- at least according to to Wikipedia, they drew lots (I.e randomly) for the individual who was killed.
I get the feeling that this is more-or-less how stack ranking actually tends to pan out.