Live data from Hacker News

My Youtube earnings

brickexperimentchannel.wordpress.com

301–310 of 422 posts

Re: My Youtube earnings

#301
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> (this) information is extremely valuable Estimating earnings based on views/subs is helpful to prospective youtubers, letting them make wise decisions about whether they pursue that path or do something else with their time (it will probably dissuade more than it will encourage, but that's a good thing if in aggregate people are making sounder career decisions).

I immediately noticed a dark dynamic based on the analytics. Lucky for OP, they are making Lego videos. However, if you are in the business of selling your opinion or sexuality, and you start to see that people click on certain hot takes or less-clothes on, you will start to morph to cater to that traffic. I wonder how this destroys a person (the greed). Totally taking the convo in the darker direction, but you can s…

His trans critiques are very reasonable though, particularly when he talks about males in women's sports, males in women's prisons, and the social contagion aspect of this type of identity.

These are the questions that cut across the entire political spectrum, as there are plenty on the left questioning the excesses of this activist movement too.

Re: My Youtube earnings

#302
post #19

The first video I watched on this channel was the Lego submarine. Quite a cool channel. The format of minimal talking and to-the-point and normal thumbnails is refreshing. Cool that one can make this much on their hobbies.

The submarine video looks cool but I think the video speed has been manipulated.

Well, of course it was, nobody is hiding it - you can see the timer in the pool part and the graph showing seconds in the beginning.

Re: My Youtube earnings

#303

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Guess we should shut down open source then.

Lots of open source is either people doing it as part of their job, or people doing it as part of building up a portfolio to get a certain job. But of course there are more intrinsic motivations like wanting to give back to the community, practising their hobby, etc. Those would be equally valid reasons to make youtube videos.

Depending on how philosophical you want to get, there'll be people who derive pleasure and purpose from sharing what they know or building something that is enjoyed by others. There'll be people who gain pleasure from being known for being helpful/useful/knowledgeable or even being recognized at all. Even if we can't call it altruism that's not necessarily a bad thing. I guess I just feel that there are, and likely will always be, plenty of incentives for people to create and share online besides financial ones.

Re: My Youtube earnings

#304

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The farm products were owned by the sharecroppers too, to eat or sell as they see fit. They just had to pay their tax to the landowner and be at their mercy regarding the property and changes in demands.

the farm products when used once are used up, videos, texts, "content" can be reused theoretically infinitely. furthermore you paid for the right to work the land what the landowner asked, nobody pays a minimum rate to have a YouTube channel that I am aware of. I understand it is a rhetorically powerful phrase, digital sharecropper, but unfortunately as often happens with analogies it falls apart with all the ways it…

>the farm products when used once are used up, videos, texts, "content" can be reused theoretically infinitely.

How is this a useful distinction? It's about how you can sell the product, but doesn't change the fact that you don't own your lot, that you pay a percentage share to the owner of the place, that they can change the terms or even crush you anytime they like, and so on.

>furthermore you paid for the right to work the land what the landowner asked, nobody pays a minimum rate to have a YouTube channel that I am aware of.

What you paid to the landowner was a percentage of your lot's production, same as with YouTube.

Re: My Youtube earnings

#305

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm aware of who he is, and the context of "liberal" when referring to him and his views. I'm offering an explanation as to why someone might describe him as "liberal", because if anyone outside the US listened to his viewpoints they would describe him as "liberal". I'd be willing to bet that the original commenter is not American, and that's why they chose "liberal", not to be misleading, but because literally the e…

> because literally the entire rest of the world uses the word differently This assumed cultural hegemony by some US citizens is frustrating as hell; they are incredibly quick to assume (or demand even) the rest of the world knows their cultural references/idioms/etc., yet make zero effort to discover what the rest of the world is doing. Unfortunately they are also loud and so it's easy to come to the false conclusio…

[deleted]

Re: My Youtube earnings

#306

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Every auto driver and worker in india ha YouTube on through their entire work shift. Meanwhile in Canada, our wireless telecoms have convinced the government that this level of bandwidth consumption should cost hundreds a month otherwise the cellular network would crash.

> our wireless telecoms have convinced the government What's the government got to do with mobile data prices?

One example: the telecoms launched an attack campaign demanding the government prevent competition from entering the market.

https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.1316055

Re: My Youtube earnings

#307
post #260

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Liberal" in the US used to mean (and still does outside the US) someone with a "live and let live" mentality, where things/actions are generally allowed unless there is a very good reason for restricting them. "Classically liberal" is a better match for the term in modern US English. So things like decriminalizing drugs, allowing gay marriage, being pro-gun/self-defense as a human right, privacy as a human right, et…

> only restricting that freedom where absolutely necessary I used to believe this as well. I was thaught a lesson... In fact, now I understand that liberals, when given the power, will corrupt into totalitarism in a few months.

What made you understand that?

Re: My Youtube earnings

#308
Love this. As a music YouTuber who can’t stop buying camera lenses and instruments and isn’t yet at the 1000 sub mark for monetization, my earnings are solidly red. Nice to see that black is possible. (I’ll keep creating and sharing either way though)

Re: My Youtube earnings

#309
post #171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

(Also this is not counting their sponsorships, merch sales, etc.)

Which is much higher than ad revenue through Google. I know it because I have a friend with a YouTube channel +5mln and he has external team handling these issues. He told me revenue from sponsorships is 4 times more from what he makes from Google and his viewers are mostly from US. However his sponsorships are really well placed and match the content. Also listening t these ads is not as painful as Linux Tech Tips,…

Not a fan of their ads too, but once Linus said that he prefer to take this wildly disconnected ads than to do something related to tech, because it's less risky. They can easily recommend a impermeable pair of shoes but not a specific gpu brand or something like this.

Re: My Youtube earnings

#310
post #291

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Liberal" in the US used to mean (and still does outside the US) someone with a "live and let live" mentality, where things/actions are generally allowed unless there is a very good reason for restricting them. "Classically liberal" is a better match for the term in modern US English. So things like decriminalizing drugs, allowing gay marriage, being pro-gun/self-defense as a human right, privacy as a human right, et…

Liberal = social freedoms + economic restrictions Republican = social restrictions + economic freedoms

... in the US.

"Classical liberalism, contrary to liberal branches like social liberalism, looks more negatively on social policies, taxation and the state involvement in the lives of individuals, and it advocates deregulation.[10] Until the Great Depression and the rise of social liberalism, it was used under the name of economic liberalism. As a term, classical liberalism was applied in retronym to distinguish earlier 19th-century liberalism from social liberalism.[11] By modern standards, in the United States, simple liberalism often means social liberalism, but in Europe and Australia, simple liberalism often means classical liberalism.[12][13]

...

In the United States, classical liberalism may be described as "fiscally conservative" and "socially liberal". Despite this context, classical liberalism rejects conservatism's higher tolerance for protectionism and social liberalism's inclination for collective group rights, due to classical liberalism's central principle of individualism.[14] Classical liberalism is also considered closely tied with right-libertarianism in the United States.[15] In Europe, liberalism, whether social (especially radical) or conservative, is classical liberalism in itself, so the term classical liberalism mainly refers to centre-right economic liberalism.[16]

"

"Liberal" in the US -> some social freedoms, but restricted in certain ways + economic restrictions.

"Liberal" outside the US -> social freedoms + economic freedoms.

I learned this as an American abroad when someone called me, who would generally be seen as conservative / libertarian in the US, "very liberal" when discussing gay rights (pro), gun rights / armed self-defense (pro), and abortion rights (pro-choice).

Again, it's just a fine point when discussing in an international context (like on HN). When speaking only with Americans, you'll never need this distinction, it's just good to be aware of it when discussing with non-Americans or when reading about foreign politics (e.g. FDP in Germany is a "liberal party" in the European sense of the word, but their policies are socially liberal and fiscally conservative. If an American reads "liberal party", they would be surprised to learn that they campaign on cutting taxes, pro free market, privatization, etc., yet are also pro gay marriage and are for legalizing marijuana: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Democratic_Party_(Germany...)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_liberalism

Post reply on HN