Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think it’s simpler than that. He was an average person. Had a lot of business acumen, particularly well timed vision (after a bunch of poor timing), then he was a really successful guy who was just as flawed as the rest of us.
I think I understand your larger point, but whatever corrections or amendments need to be made to the myth of Jobs, the idea that he was in any way average shouldn’t be one.
Sergey Brin: Irate Call from Steve Jobs
201–210 of 398 posts
Re: Sergey Brin: Irate Call from Steve Jobs
#202Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seems like a small price to pay to assemble the most innovative animation studio that would bring joy to millions of people for decades.
You're saying serfdom and bullying is justified by .. art?
Re: Sergey Brin: Irate Call from Steve Jobs
#203Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're saying serfdom and bullying is justified by .. art?
Why did you substitute "art" for "bringing joy to millions of people for decades"?
Re: Sergey Brin: Irate Call from Steve Jobs
#204Re: Sergey Brin: Irate Call from Steve Jobs
#205Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s an honor to be suppressed by C-levels in two giant corporations! It isn’t fawning over the people who systematically deny me seeking value for my talent, I’m privileged to have both of them fuck me simultaneously!
You’re still missing the forest for the trees. It’s unrealistic for execs in companies that size to even take a cursory review of why each individual person left the company (and they would be incompetently wasting their time if they did). Anything that involves the attention enough to warrant actual emails makes that employee extraordinary. This is the same whether the outcome is negative or positive.
Re: Sergey Brin: Irate Call from Steve Jobs
#206Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why did you substitute "art" for "bringing joy to millions of people for decades"?
Why does it matter? Is pixar selling drugs now? Or do you not place cartoons in art, alongside Salvador dali who worked with Walt Disney?
Re: Sergey Brin: Irate Call from Steve Jobs
#207Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm sure they can comfort themselves on the quarter to half a million annual they were being paid instead of the half a million to three quarters of a million a zero collusion market would have offered them. ;)
“Got table scraps; good table scraps, could’ve been better mind you, not especially great; enriched a few.” There, I think I know what to put in my will as how I will wish to be remembered.
I realize we are on a forum/platform that is home to a disproportionately high number of wealthier individuals, but are you actually suggesting that $250 million annually is "table scraps"?
Re: Sergey Brin: Irate Call from Steve Jobs
#208Earlier quoted context omitted.
The dude basically chose to die of treatable cancer in his 50s because he just didn't like the idea of getting medical treatment. That's one of the most odd behaviors I've ever heard of.
Plenty of incredibly smart people think and do incredibly stupid things. Isaac Newton was one of the greatest mathematicians and physicists of history, inventor of the telescope, father of Newtonian mechanics, and a key figure of the Enlightenment. Yet he considered that scientific work of lesser importance, spending much of his effort studying the occult, biblical interpretation, and alchemy.
Re: Sergey Brin: Irate Call from Steve Jobs
#209Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seems like a small price to pay to assemble the most innovative animation studio that would bring joy to millions of people for decades.
Whether it's "a small price to pay" depends on each and every individual that paid the price. I don't think it makes any sense for 1 single person to decide if the price paid was small, simply because they don't know what actual price was paid (in terms of suffering). Also, it sounds to me that's you're assuming that's a necessitated price to pay, which I don't believe is true (but I don't have any examples either).
Re: Sergey Brin: Irate Call from Steve Jobs
#210This is interesting to read from the angle of personality dynamics. People underestimate the sense of control that Jobs derived, not from being prophetic or smart, but from making things extremely personal and psychologically stifling for other people. (Musk works in the same way when he gets flustered or fearful.) Jobs talked a lot about seeing the future, but his high-use "like/dislike switch" was really in control…
Jobs was a poet. A brutal, calculating, ruthless businessman, but ultimately a poet. I have no doubt that every important decision in his life was driven primarily by emotion.
No. No he wasn't. Not in the literal or figurative sense. But I get what you're doing in saying that.
Really the Steve Jobs worship is something I'm thankful to see going away day by day.