Live data from Hacker News

My Youtube earnings

brickexperimentchannel.wordpress.com

171–180 of 422 posts

Re: My Youtube earnings

#171
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Makes me wonder how YouTube channels like Linus Tech Tips are able to seemingly hire around one-hundred full time staff? Linus Tech Tips posted their youtube revenue just the other day[0]. For posterity, it's about 4.6 million, and only shows March-December. I can't find the original tweet that is the source of this information. [0]: https://www.reddit.com/r/LinusTechTips/comments/100fmgx/linu...

(Also this is not counting their sponsorships, merch sales, etc.)

Which is much higher than ad revenue through Google. I know it because I have a friend with a YouTube channel +5mln and he has external team handling these issues. He told me revenue from sponsorships is 4 times more from what he makes from Google and his viewers are mostly from US.

However his sponsorships are really well placed and match the content. Also listening t these ads is not as painful as Linux Tech Tips, so probably he makes more from sponsorships than average.

Yes, so there are YouTube ads and sponsorship segments and people still watch it

Re: My Youtube earnings

#172
post #131

> There are many, many creators who release Lego videos continuously and have no subs and get no views. Too many. Hundreds, maybe thousands of such creators. It is kind of heartbreaking to see people put so much time and effort for (supposedly) nothing. this is the saddest part. he is in the top 0.1% of his genre and making $90 an hour, but 99.9% of them make nothing. i dont know what drives people to want to make vi…

I have made some videos and they rarely break 1000 views. But they have contributed in me getting multiple jobs in my field as they demonstrate that I actually know some of the stuff I claim to. The videos also make it clear I can express myself clearly in english amd communicate technical concepts. So not every channel needs a huge audience, sometimes the right few viewers are enough.

Re: My Youtube earnings

#173
post #42

The most impressive part is the creator gets to have a probably comfortable living from a channel that grew organically and still 100% depends on youtube’s algorithm. I follow the channel for years now, anyone not familiar should have a look [0]. It’s not “viral” targeted videos with crazy face thumbnails, borderline clickbaity titles, ABtested through a week, no “I got to stick to the schedule” weekly videos etc. Th…

Another example is probably the Primitive Technology channel. Last week I was reading his interview and he mentions $1M savings from his channel.

It would also be interesting to see what his per hour is, after expenses.

I'm pretty sure those videos take a LONG time to make.

Re: My Youtube earnings

#174
post #151
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I wonder how much other information exists on the web that is extremely valuable yet unnoticed This is pretty common knowledge for monetized or high viewership (sponsored/paid for outside of Google) channels.

It may be common knowledge for people that already have a channel, but I’ve never seen anyone give exact revenue numbers to outsiders before.

Lots of youtubers publish this, like EEVBlog and Andreas Spiess also.

Re: My Youtube earnings

#175
I'd bet his ad revenue is higher than normal. Lego sounds like a perfect subject for ad supported.

Inexpensive (somewhat), easy to buy on line, always another kit to buy.

Take 3blue1brown. Fantastic content, but what ads relate? (Probably Lego, but that might just be me).

Re: My Youtube earnings

#176

The most impressive part is the creator gets to have a probably comfortable living from a channel that grew organically and still 100% depends on youtube’s algorithm. I follow the channel for years now, anyone not familiar should have a look [0]. It’s not “viral” targeted videos with crazy face thumbnails, borderline clickbaity titles, ABtested through a week, no “I got to stick to the schedule” weekly videos etc. Th…

> IMO there’s very few channels that stayed very basic and true to their form

It’s always disappointing when a channel I enjoy goes into the “reaction video”, YouTube drama, clickbait type spiral :(

Re: My Youtube earnings

#177
post #8

> mostly middle-aged males No, most viewers were 18-44. "Middle-aged" is 45-65.

65 is only middle-aged if you plan to live to 130...

> 65 is only middle-aged if you plan to live to 130...

60 is a more usual endpoint, but...

It's a range. The middle of that range is 55, so following that math it would be 110, not 130.

But as the other reply points out, it's the middle section of being an adult. So if you take that 45-65 range, and treat it as the exact middle of your adult life, then you get 92, which is a bit high but not crazy. If you take that 45-65 range and assume old age will be the same length, you get 85, which is pretty close for wealthy non-US countries.

Re: My Youtube earnings

#178
$90 is not much for all that. As an employee, that's pretty good, but as someone who probably had to invest thousands of hours before he knew if he'd see any revenue, that's a pretty meager return!

It would be interesting to see his revenue graphed over time. Pretty sure he didn't make 12k/mo for the first few years. Which means he's making more Than that, now.

Re: My Youtube earnings

#179
post #9

This is fantastic information and very sobering for those of us with smaller channels. I had 10-50 views per month until two weeks ago and I got 200k views suddenly thanks to the algorithm, but it's already peaked so I expect I can't make more than a few dollars per month. See what happens though!

Wow how’s you get such a huge jump in views? my best video has 8k views, coming in at between 100-1000 per month depending how many impressions the algorithm decides to allot to me.

> Wow how’s you get such a huge jump in views?

I honestly have no idea, but I doubt it reached "the front page of YouTube" like the sibling post suggested or it would have millions.

Somehow it must've got suggested to a few people and maybe it had a high engagement rate (likes and comments?) which was somehow taken positively. I'm purely guessing though.

It really isn't an impressive video though it does have a 99% like ratio. I'm a bit embarrassed to self promote here so I'll email you based on your HN profile site contact page.

Re: My Youtube earnings

#180

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I personally dislike the “channelization” of YouTube. The whole point of the internet is that it doesn’t have the restrictions of linear media. Search solves that problem of content discovery. Now YouTube won’t pay you unless you have 1000 subscribers. But a lot of content just isn’t subscribeable and that’s ok . Pre-1000 sub requirement, I put up a video for a niche MacBook Air microphone issue and repair that wasn’…

> Meanwhile when I wrote disparate blog articles, I went from $2/month, to $20, to $200 to $2000, and it’s because Google search sent you to me. Not because you bookmarked me. What methods did you use to monetize your blog?

> Meanwhile when I wrote disparate blog articles, I went from $2/month, to $20, to $200 to $2000, and it’s because Google search sent you to me.

Imagine if Google trained an LLM on its index and started providing answers without ever sending users your way… Actually, we have a suitable example of just that being done. /s

I bookmarked this as a vivid illustration of my gripe with LLMs, and more specifically their creator/operators’ meticulous avoidance of the topic of attribution.

You’d think it’s fairly feasible: if training data had attribution, I can’t see how LLM would not be able to separate substance from style and some reflection on the former, so that if most of topical substance is found to come from only 1–2 sources it would just note those sources for the user. If you provide actually niche content, when ChatGPT answers relevant questions the substance may well come from your body of work alone.

Yet the asker pays LLM operator and is never informed you exist: you, in turn, stand to lose not only your ad revenue but also the potential ability to upsell something, engage with your audience, learn who that audience even is and how your work is sought, and just generally feel useful and valued.

Give it time and sufficient popularity of LLMs and no one will even be inclined to believe that you did the original work in the first place—since from anyone’s perspective you might as well have asked LLM.

The cynic in me says operators are particularly interested in public not asking the question whether it’s feasible to attribute LLM output because it may make them liable to pass to countless volunteer writers, turned involuntary training data providers, part of the profits made from running the model. Another reason might be that researching original authorship requires manual human labour proportionate to the size of training data, and who would ever want to pay for that? Definitely not a startup with millions in funding from Silicon Valley investors.

It is just me or all incentives to openly share useful information (as opposed to pure entertainment) are in jeopardy now?

/thread hijack

Post reply on HN