Live data from Hacker News

Twitter Sued for Nonpayment of Rent on San Francisco Office

bloomberg.com

211–220 of 250 posts

Re: Twitter Sued for Nonpayment of Rent on San Francisco Office

#211
post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They had to cut costs to keep away from the "fast lane to bankruptcy". When not pulling in enough revenue, you have to act quickly. https://youtu.be/HE5CTKqWEV0?t=3570 Wasn't twitter supposed to stop working by now? They are still functioning, despite the layoffs. Maybe it worked?

> Wasn't twitter supposed to stop working by now? They are still functioning, despite the layoffs. Maybe it worked? It is mostly because the people left are working twice as much, long hours, holidays, weekends. And if you actually use the app, half the things aren’t working. Plus, your argument is more like “I fired the gardener after he tended the yard, it’s been a week, the yard looks just fine. Maybe I didn’t nee…

Works for me.

Re: Twitter Sued for Nonpayment of Rent on San Francisco Office

#212
post #109
post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They had to cut costs to keep away from the "fast lane to bankruptcy". When not pulling in enough revenue, you have to act quickly. https://youtu.be/HE5CTKqWEV0?t=3570 Wasn't twitter supposed to stop working by now? They are still functioning, despite the layoffs. Maybe it worked?

> Wasn't twitter supposed to stop working by now? They are still functioning, despite the layoffs. Maybe it worked? I still expect it to stop working gradually, then all at once. Saying that the fact that Twitter hasn't collapsed yet means the previous staffing level was not justified is a bit like saying you shouldn't have paid a builder to put in a foundation because your house hasn't fallen down yet.

I don't think anyone is truly shocked by the notion that Twitter is over-staffed with a lot of fat it can cut. They were not exactly employing a lot of "builders", as they had not updated any new features for quite some time.

Re: Twitter Sued for Nonpayment of Rent on San Francisco Office

#213
post #116
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It was not really an outage. Devices had to login again. I noticed having to do that.

Your experience was not the sum total of the incident. There was indeed a partial outage: https://news.yahoo.com/twitter-down-thousands-users-downdete...

And it was fixed in due time.

Re: Twitter Sued for Nonpayment of Rent on San Francisco Office

#214
post #104

It’s not made obvious by the article, but this lawsuit is for non-payment on a lease of one floor of 650 California St, not for non-payment on the 1355 Market St headquarters. They are also not paying rent at the latter, so presumably another lawsuit is coming. My assumption though is that they have already vacated the now extraneous space at 650 California and will settle with the landlord to break the lease.

Not the only, or biggest, nonpayment lawsuit they are facing: https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/Bay-Area-softwar...

[dead]

Re: Twitter Sued for Nonpayment of Rent on San Francisco Office

#216
post #104

It’s not made obvious by the article, but this lawsuit is for non-payment on a lease of one floor of 650 California St, not for non-payment on the 1355 Market St headquarters. They are also not paying rent at the latter, so presumably another lawsuit is coming. My assumption though is that they have already vacated the now extraneous space at 650 California and will settle with the landlord to break the lease.

The article references the NYT as reporting they're not paying rent anywhere:

> Twitter hasn’t paid rent on its headquarters, or any of its other global offices, in weeks, the New York Times reported on Dec. 13.

Re: Twitter Sued for Nonpayment of Rent on San Francisco Office

#217

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And look at HY indexes. The marks that have been in the media are roughly where other HY bonds have moved. Banks have bids but they are seeking bids from hedge funds that trade in distressed debt, who are obviously going to bid with a markup (the same thing happened with British corporates a few months, because pension funds had to sell they had to take bids from hedge funds so the bonds went from 100 t0 90 for AAA s…

> The 50% markdown that Fidelity is taking means that it is worth more than $20bn. Care to explain? When the debt is already being marked down, how does the equity have any positive value? (other than maybe extreme variance, but I still don't see how that gets anywhere near 20?)

If you don't understand, this discussion is totally pointless.

Re: Twitter Sued for Nonpayment of Rent on San Francisco Office

#218
post #36

Reputation matters.

Increasingly less so, it seems. After all, the guy that turned stiffing vendors into an art form and lying about his taxes didn't just become POTUS, but pulled in more votes than any other president (besides the sitting one).

Re: Twitter Sued for Nonpayment of Rent on San Francisco Office

#219
post #216
post #104

It’s not made obvious by the article, but this lawsuit is for non-payment on a lease of one floor of 650 California St, not for non-payment on the 1355 Market St headquarters. They are also not paying rent at the latter, so presumably another lawsuit is coming. My assumption though is that they have already vacated the now extraneous space at 650 California and will settle with the landlord to break the lease.

The article references the NYT as reporting they're not paying rent anywhere: > Twitter hasn’t paid rent on its headquarters, or any of its other global offices, in weeks, the New York Times reported on Dec. 13.

Use this simple trick to immediately lower your companie's cost!
Post reply on HN