Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Did TeXmacs' doubly misleading name hold it back for 20 years?

news.ycombinator.com

1–10 of 61 posts

Re: Ask HN: Did TeXmacs' doubly misleading name hold it back for 20 years?

#7
I prefer using TeXstudio as a TeX editor. Naturally, I thought that TeXmacs is the pendant in Emacs.

Up to this point it did not occur to me that TeXmacs is _not_ using TeX at all.

I guess that I am not alone with that thought. Does it use Emacs, then?

Re: Ask HN: Did TeXmacs' doubly misleading name hold it back for 20 years?

#8
post #7

I prefer using TeXstudio as a TeX editor. Naturally, I thought that TeXmacs is the pendant in Emacs. Up to this point it did not occur to me that TeXmacs is _not_ using TeX at all. I guess that I am not alone with that thought. Does it use Emacs, then?

It doesn't use emacs either. It is only inspired by it.

Re: Ask HN: Did TeXmacs' doubly misleading name hold it back for 20 years?

#10
The name doesn't help, but while it may produce output out of the box that looks as good as LaTeX, the website also doesn't directly answer another question which matters to people who need to do typesetting things with it that have been solved by others: the huge package ecosystem of LaTeX (and the batteries-included distributions like TeX Live).
Post reply on HN