Time to redefine normal body temperature? (2020)
41–50 of 148 posts
Re: Time to redefine normal body temperature? (2020)
#42Re: Time to redefine normal body temperature? (2020)
#43> [One key possibility] ... Lower metabolic rate: One of the biggest determinants of body temperature is your metabolic rate. Like a car engine that’s idling, your body expends energy just keeping things going, and that generates heat. A lower metabolic rate in modern times could be due to higher body mass (some studies link this with lower metabolic rate), or better medical treatments, preventive measures, and overa…
I'm curious how direct it is. If someone starts exercising from being sedentary for years does their body temperature raise appreciably?
Re: Time to redefine normal body temperature? (2020)
#44Is it possible that thermometer calibration has just drifted slightly over the last couple hundred years? If you told me that the typical electronic thermometer today actually measured around a degree different than the mercury thermometer Wunderlich presumably used, I wouldn't be all too surprised. Or is there really an accurate and consistent calibration technique that's been in use since at least the 1800s, so we…
Re: Time to redefine normal body temperature? (2020)
#45> [One key possibility] ... Lower metabolic rate: One of the biggest determinants of body temperature is your metabolic rate. Like a car engine that’s idling, your body expends energy just keeping things going, and that generates heat. A lower metabolic rate in modern times could be due to higher body mass (some studies link this with lower metabolic rate), or better medical treatments, preventive measures, and overa…
Re: Time to redefine normal body temperature? (2020)
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
Even “around” is meaningless without context. A hot day is around 37c (+/- 10), a healthy person is around 37c (+/- 1) and a manufacturing process could call for a temp around 37c (+/- 0.1).
The accuracy is implied in the nimber of dogots usually. So 37 is +-1C, 40 is +-10, and 36.6 is +-0.1
You can't provide a scaled ranges with the digits alone like that.
Just use ± or a hyphenated range, and take it in context with adjacent measurements.
Re: Time to redefine normal body temperature? (2020)
#47Re: Time to redefine normal body temperature? (2020)
#48Is it possible that thermometer calibration has just drifted slightly over the last couple hundred years? If you told me that the typical electronic thermometer today actually measured around a degree different than the mercury thermometer Wunderlich presumably used, I wouldn't be all too surprised. Or is there really an accurate and consistent calibration technique that's been in use since at least the 1800s, so we…
Uh surely "mmHg" is a stable unit of measurement where the calibration is self-evident by its own definition.
Re: Time to redefine normal body temperature? (2020)
#49https://fireinabottle.net/this-is-your-body-temperature-on-v...
Re: Time to redefine normal body temperature? (2020)
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
Even “around” is meaningless without context. A hot day is around 37c (+/- 10), a healthy person is around 37c (+/- 1) and a manufacturing process could call for a temp around 37c (+/- 0.1).
> A hot day is around 37c (+/- 10) Absolutely not. 47C is an emergency, not "hot".