Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's no singular 'linux experience', all the problems you list are expected problems with some software on linux, but work just fine with other software systems on linux. Unfortunately many of the defaults chosen by Ubuntu are very poor and give bad first impressions. I think that recommending Ubuntu is an anachronism from the mid to late 00s. Experience makes it all much easier, simply because you learn which sof…
> I think that recommending Ubuntu is an anachronism from the mid to late 00s. What would you recommend as a modern-day user-friendly Linux experience? I've been looking for something not too demanding to put on an old X220.
2022 was the year of Linux on the Desktop?
291–300 of 351 posts
Re: 2022 was the year of Linux on the Desktop?
#292Re: 2022 was the year of Linux on the Desktop?
#293Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nah, it's pretty inexcusable for Gnome to not surface such a setting. LXQt's mouse configuration GUI lets you configure it, and LXQt has no more than a handful of people working on it. Gnome has more developer resources and could implement this easily, but they also have an attitude problem and bad priorities.
Yeah, the clear problem here is GNOME and it's arrogant disregard for users... Which I guess really is historically in line with Linux culture, unfortunately.
Re: 2022 was the year of Linux on the Desktop?
#294Until Acrobat, Photoshop, and Illustrator work in Wine, it's a hard no. Word and Excel are good :) plus there are tolerable replacements. Outlook is buggy as hell, but evolution can do its job. But when I need to fill out and digitally sign a PDF form - something that should be an easy and mundane task - the entire Linux ecosystem fails me. Also, task prioritization is still horrible. I fire up a high CPU background…
Re: 2022 was the year of Linux on the Desktop?
#295Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or “You mean you want to run two monitors with different DPIs? What kind of oddball user are you, anyway?” Linux display stack’s treatment of monitor DPI is basically “throw our hands up and let apps like Firefox make it work!”
I think you gave this example as a joke, but here is a quote from one of the Wayland developers: > I would suggest that this setting [UI scale] needs to be a global and not a per-output thing. If it was a per-output thing, windows moving between different monitors would probably have problems (text size changes while window size does not?). It is hard to imagine how it would work as a per-output setting, for me at le…
Re: 2022 was the year of Linux on the Desktop?
#296Earlier quoted context omitted.
Linux scrub Q, does NVIDIA not use any Linux for themselves? Or is it a financial reason to ignore Linux?
NVidia makes the best Linux driver + graphics card combination going, and always have. If you actually want to play games on Linux, NVidia cards are the way to go. But open-source people don't like them because their driver isn't open-source, and Wayland people don't like them because their driver has limited Wayland support.
Re: 2022 was the year of Linux on the Desktop?
#297Earlier quoted context omitted.
The apparently innocent "sharing" of positive experiences - so sweet! so nice! - is from Linux self-identifiers all too often a very crude backhanded "you're wrong about the problems you claim to have with Linux, and if you're not wrong, then you're at least thick or lazy".
You've pulled these insults out of thin air. I have no animosity towards Windows or Mac users, nor for those that might hypothetically like Linux but understandably have better things to do with their time than learn the ins and outs of it.
This is me. I have one SSD each dedicated to Windows and Linux, and I use Linux fairly regularly. However, I still use Windows for most of my work, because Linux's multi-monitor, Wayland, and HiDPI support is still questionable. I used to love to tinker, but now I just want to get my work done.
Re: 2022 was the year of Linux on the Desktop?
#298Earlier quoted context omitted.
Same story: 16 core, 64GB ram, 6900xt. And nothing crashes because even when being ridiculous I knew better than use Nvidia on Linux
Meanwhile, my Linux partition is rock solid and I cannot for the life of me figure out random hangs and crashes on clean Windows installs. It is an Nvidia GPU. Honestly, they’re rarely the problem in Linux. Not in practice anyway. Any hardware diag I try passes. Drivers? Tried both manufacturer and Windows Update. Always ends the same. The mouse driver BSODed the machine one time. That was a new one. I’ll stick with…
Re: 2022 was the year of Linux on the Desktop?
#299Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'll take "Sentiments from the Linux Community that Actively Drive Users Away" for 300.
Yeah, there's a huge problem in the community where every problem is the user's fault. Like, using the most popular graphics card provider on Linux shouldn't be some outlandish idea that should be ridiculed.
Re: 2022 was the year of Linux on the Desktop?
#300If I'm honest, Linux is...exhausting. I'm technically proficient, but even the "user-friendly" Ubuntu is a pain to work with. Something as simple as changing the mouse scroll speed requires creating a bash script. Software updates rarely work. There are random crashes that take hours to fix. I'm about to give in the towel and get a Mac. I can get it to work because the terminal doesn't scare me, but there's no way I…
Try KDE / Kubuntu, it features the scroll speed control [1]. (Xfce, sadly, does not.)
Also sadly, Mac is increasingly windows-like, with things that tend not to work out of the box (and just unsupported), and software updates bringing some trouble, especially huge updates like a new OS version.
I stick with a Linux desktop where I at least acceptably understand and control every important aspect. I did have a Mac at work for several years, and it was also pretty fiddly in certain aspects.