Live data from Hacker News

Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang are cooperating in the criminal case against SBF

nytimes.com

261–270 of 338 posts

Re: Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang are cooperating in the criminal case against SBF

#261
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

110 years! I wonder how many she'll get out of that for being the first out of the woodwork.

110 years, fine of up to 2x the "pecuniary gain" of the fraud, and last but certainly not least, a "$100 mandatory special assessment" for each of the seven counts. Gotta pay for those Federal investigators somehow! Also, I like how the they're very clear that restitution must be made as "a sum of money in United States currency", as opposed to, say, FTT tokens or Bored Ape NFTs. However, the section on forfeiting th…

The token will definitively be bid at. The fact that they are being sold on a US government auction will give them some value. Drama never ends in crypto land.

Re: Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang are cooperating in the criminal case against SBF

#262

The bigger story is that in their complaint, the SEC is declaring FTT to be an investment contract and therefore a "security". https://finance.yahoo.com/news/sec-calls-ftt-exchange-token-... Since all exchange native tokens more or less work the same way, that would mean they are all securities. That would include BNB. If this holds, the crypto exchange game is over.

Wasn't this already the SEC's position?

The original position was that cryptocurrencies were commodities not securities, and that is what allowed all the bullshit to flourish. In July of 2017 the SEC issued a ruling that any coin issued via ICO could be considered a security on a case by case basis. Yesterday is the first time I've seen the SEC make the argument that exchange native tokens are investment contracts and therefore securities.

Re: Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang are cooperating in the criminal case against SBF

#263

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wasn't this already the SEC's position?

The original position was that cryptocurrencies were commodities not securities, and that is what allowed all the bullshit to flourish. In July of 2017 the SEC issued a ruling that any coin issued via ICO could be considered a security on a case by case basis. Yesterday is the first time I've seen the SEC make the argument that exchange native tokens are investment contracts and therefore securities.

Exchange tokens are amongst the more obvious securities IMO. I think they tick all marks of the Howey Test:

    - An investment of money
        (Send money/BTC, get token)
    - In a common enterprise 
        (the exchange)
    - With the expectation of profit
        (Token burns)
    - To be derived from the efforts of others
        (Exchange pays with profits for token burns)
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/howey-test.asp

Re: Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang are cooperating in the criminal case against SBF

#264

Earlier quoted context omitted.

She got 11 years for not delivering 10x to the VC's. Just imagine what you would get for fucking with peoples health.

She got 11 years for lying about her product in order to defraud people...

Well, we have to better define "people ". IIRC she was only found guilty of defrauding their rich/large investors, not the general population. It was her boyfriend who was found guilty of that.

Now, regarding SBF, I can imagine there are some big wigs that had their money in there, not only nobodys like you and I. That's the only reason why I think they will get shafted.

Re: Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang are cooperating in the criminal case against SBF

#265

Caroline's dad is an MIT econ prof and wrote a series of books titled Hard Math for X. New installment should surely be Hard Math for Crypto Fraud and Jail Evasion.

Shouldn't be that hard, Michael Milken is doing fine. "He is known for his role in the development of the market for high-yield bonds ("junk bonds"), and his conviction and sentence following a guilty plea on felony charges for violating U.S. securities laws... With a net worth of $6 billion as of 2022, he is ranked by Forbes magazine as the 412th richest person in the world" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Mil…

None of the people involved in this can hold a candle to the force that is Michael Milken

Re: Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang are cooperating in the criminal case against SBF

#266

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The idea that there is some agreement for say 5 years recommended is not on the table in this type of situation. That is absolutely the situation. That’s why you take the deal. They got her to plead to seven counts! There’s almost certainly an agreed-upon recommended sentencing.

If they agreed to it - it would be in the document. Instead it says: > This Office cannot, and does not, make any promise of representation as to what sentence the defendant wil receive, and will not recommend any specific sentence to the Court. That's not in every federal plea agreement. If there was a deal done for sentencing guidance, it would be there to read. A common one is something like "Acceptance of Respons…

I just think of the scene in Archer where the interrogations begin with each character saying "I want full immunity.", leads into a montage of them ratting out everything everyone else has ever done, and ends with the interrogator saying "I didn't say anything about immunity, you're the one who brought it up."

Re: Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang are cooperating in the criminal case against SBF

#267
post #190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Same with the "street value" they cite in drug busts. Sure, that guy with 100kg of coke is going to be selling it in little 1g baggies.

Well, that's a lie which at times has real impact on trial outcomes. I wouldn't really put it in the same category.

Sentences for federal drug crimes are based on substance weight, not value.

Re: Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang are cooperating in the criminal case against SBF

#268

The bigger story is that in their complaint, the SEC is declaring FTT to be an investment contract and therefore a "security". https://finance.yahoo.com/news/sec-calls-ftt-exchange-token-... Since all exchange native tokens more or less work the same way, that would mean they are all securities. That would include BNB. If this holds, the crypto exchange game is over.

This is just a jurisdictional turf war. SEC calls them securities and CFTC calls them commodities. The courts will decide. Re FTX via CFTC:

"The complaint charges all three defendants with fraud and material misrepresentations in connection with the sale of digital commodities in interstate commerce."

https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8638-22

Re: Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang are cooperating in the criminal case against SBF

#269

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nice comparison. Trabucco resigned in August but Caroline was on record saying he hadn’t been around for months. Some Alameda loans were called in May, and that is when SBF and Caroline did some obviously shady stuff. I think that is when he walked, as that is when the trading strategy became limited to just propping up FTT to fake the balance sheet. He seemed like a legit trader based on his Twitter. It takes about…

He made several stupid claims on his twitter about trading that anyone in the industry would immediately infer was a complete misunderstanding of the basics of finance. As did SBF and Caroline. Nothing about them was smart. It was a lot of jargon thrown into their talk that should tickle most people’s spidey senses.

Exactly this. All of their "What happened?" threads were hot air, sprinkled with some instances of "ev+" that cryptotwitter quant wannabes latched on to.

Re: Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang are cooperating in the criminal case against SBF

#270

The bigger story is that in their complaint, the SEC is declaring FTT to be an investment contract and therefore a "security". https://finance.yahoo.com/news/sec-calls-ftt-exchange-token-... Since all exchange native tokens more or less work the same way, that would mean they are all securities. That would include BNB. If this holds, the crypto exchange game is over.

They offered margin trading and all kinds of other things, the pitch being "like an exchange but with crypto". Why would anyone think it's not securities?

The tokenomics are important. They could create as many PoW blockchains as they wanted without the coins being securities. The important part is that they created all tokens themselves and then sold them via ICO with funding rounds to investors who expected to make a profit from it.

https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/ftx-token/tokenomics

I think it is more of a stretch to call FTT a cryptocurrency than calling it a security.

Post reply on HN