Live data from Hacker News

Blue subscribers should be the only ones that can vote in policy related polls

twitter.com

1–10 of 56 posts

Re: Blue subscribers should be the only ones that can vote in policy related polls

#3
post #2

This is perfectly legal, and OK with me, but many will perceive it as "democracy for those who can pay."

Why would an 8 dollar fee discourage nation states with massive bot army budgets? He owns the site and can do whatever he wants, but why is there all of this performative behaviour.

Re: Blue subscribers should be the only ones that can vote in policy related polls

#4
This seems a bit contradictory to his “vox populi” mantra. On the other hand, it does align with his conservative political ideology of changing election rules when they don’t go your way.

He may also just be trolling with this post.

Re: Blue subscribers should be the only ones that can vote in policy related polls

#6
So, at first, Elon Musk declared that the "current lords & peasants system" is bad.

Now, he's implementing a system where it's Lord Elon, his $8 Vassals, and the rest of the unwashed Peasants cannot speak.

He seems rather unclear on concepts of equality and free speech . . .

Re: Blue subscribers should be the only ones that can vote in policy related polls

#8
post #6

So, at first, Elon Musk declared that the "current lords & peasants system" is bad. Now, he's implementing a system where it's Lord Elon, his $8 Vassals, and the rest of the unwashed Peasants cannot speak. He seems rather unclear on concepts of equality and free speech . . .

Yes, he is replacing the nobility with a theocracy.

Re: Blue subscribers should be the only ones that can vote in policy related polls

#9
post #6

So, at first, Elon Musk declared that the "current lords & peasants system" is bad. Now, he's implementing a system where it's Lord Elon, his $8 Vassals, and the rest of the unwashed Peasants cannot speak. He seems rather unclear on concepts of equality and free speech . . .

He had a good idea before the acquisition which was “authenticate all real humans”. Seems like that’d solve many issues on the platform, but imagine it’d be expensive to implement.
Post reply on HN