Earlier quoted context omitted.
I haven't had it personally, but one of my SO's tried a famous "perpetual stew" when in France and we talked about it at one point. Her description kinda matched what I'd expect from braises that I've let go to long: you end up with bland mush. I think there's a reason very few restaurants serve this style of dish, and it's not because of health codes. We live in an era of insane abundance compared to the medeivil an…
It's a romantic notion but if you simmer anything for too long it'll just be generic food water at some point
‘Perpetual broths’ that simmer for decades
161–170 of 182 posts
Re: ‘Perpetual broths’ that simmer for decades
#162Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's a romantic notion but if you simmer anything for too long it'll just be generic food water at some point
How does this make any sense? The longer you simmer something, the more concentrated the remaining material becomes.
Re: ‘Perpetual broths’ that simmer for decades
#163Re: ‘Perpetual broths’ that simmer for decades
#164Earlier quoted context omitted.
Perhaps i'm geeking this out too much, but I guess it depends on ingress-vs-egress and drawdown....but...doesn't including nearly spoiling food risk the whole stew going bad in a few days? Or do the constant simmer prevent that?
Before refrigeration people were a lot less picky about what was considered spoiled food. One of my grandmothers would never look at the dates, but just trusted her eyes, nose and tongue as to whether something was fit for consumption or not, regardless of how much it was past the 'best before' date.
Re: ‘Perpetual broths’ that simmer for decades
#165Re: ‘Perpetual broths’ that simmer for decades
#166Earlier quoted context omitted.
Before refrigeration people were a lot less picky about what was considered spoiled food. One of my grandmothers would never look at the dates, but just trusted her eyes, nose and tongue as to whether something was fit for consumption or not, regardless of how much it was past the 'best before' date.
It works most of the time, but not always, traditions around food are important. Rice is particularly insidious, rice grains carry Bacillus cereus spores that germinate after cooking. The trouble is that that particular bug grows at fridge temperatures and generates a heat-stable exotoxin. Any prepared rice older than 24 hours has the potential to give you really roaring diarrhea, even if it doesn't taste off.
Re: ‘Perpetual broths’ that simmer for decades
#167Re: ‘Perpetual broths’ that simmer for decades
#168Earlier quoted context omitted.
Before refrigeration people were a lot less picky about what was considered spoiled food. One of my grandmothers would never look at the dates, but just trusted her eyes, nose and tongue as to whether something was fit for consumption or not, regardless of how much it was past the 'best before' date.
It works most of the time, but not always, traditions around food are important. Rice is particularly insidious, rice grains carry Bacillus cereus spores that germinate after cooking. The trouble is that that particular bug grows at fridge temperatures and generates a heat-stable exotoxin. Any prepared rice older than 24 hours has the potential to give you really roaring diarrhea, even if it doesn't taste off.
Re: ‘Perpetual broths’ that simmer for decades
#169Earlier quoted context omitted.
It works most of the time, but not always, traditions around food are important. Rice is particularly insidious, rice grains carry Bacillus cereus spores that germinate after cooking. The trouble is that that particular bug grows at fridge temperatures and generates a heat-stable exotoxin. Any prepared rice older than 24 hours has the potential to give you really roaring diarrhea, even if it doesn't taste off.
Wait so even if rice goes directly from the cooker to the refrigerator, it should be eaten within 24 hours? I break this rule all the time, no diarrhea yet