Somewhat on this topic, I wish one could compare motherboards by the time-to-boot delay.
If reviewers start benchmarking something, manufacturers will optimize for it eventually.
31–40 of 185 posts
Somewhat on this topic, I wish one could compare motherboards by the time-to-boot delay.
If reviewers start benchmarking something, manufacturers will optimize for it eventually.
You'll need a fancy KVM switch that does more than merely acting much like a physical switch would. Something like this should probably work: https://www.rextron.com/product-4K-2-Port-Full-Frame-PBP-KVM... Edit: The one above is merely the first one I found, not a recommendation. Be aware that such things may incur extra latency, since it's not just passing signals through, but rather processing them and repackaging…
I suspect there is a tiny CPU inside the monitor that looks at a variety of things before deciding how to decode the signal and present it. As @alin23 notes, DDC protocol is also handled. Obviously the manufacturers are using the lowest cost BOM that they can get away with and that would probably mean a $1 microprocessor in charge of the "smarts".
You'll need a fancy KVM switch that does more than merely acting much like a physical switch would. Something like this should probably work: https://www.rextron.com/product-4K-2-Port-Full-Frame-PBP-KVM... Edit: The one above is merely the first one I found, not a recommendation. Be aware that such things may incur extra latency, since it's not just passing signals through, but rather processing them and repackaging…
There is no price listed for this switch. How much does it cost?
They also support hot key switching, so my hands don't need to leave the keyboard to switch, which is nice.
You'll need a fancy KVM switch that does more than merely acting much like a physical switch would. Something like this should probably work: https://www.rextron.com/product-4K-2-Port-Full-Frame-PBP-KVM... Edit: The one above is merely the first one I found, not a recommendation. Be aware that such things may incur extra latency, since it's not just passing signals through, but rather processing them and repackaging…
Unfortunately I have a similar KVM switch and it is very much not instant. In the same 4 second ballpark as OP. Annoys me too but I just put up with it since I don't have to switch very often and it's sure faster than switching inputs on my monitor's shitty OSD which is what I used to do.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's impossible about it? I've seen devices in the past that can combine multiple HDMI signals into a single image (like picture-in-picture, or making one high-res display out of several lower-res video connections). And if you can do that, surely you can do instant switching just by toggling between "full screen input 1" and "full screen input 2" layouts.
Were any of these devices monitors? Were they cheap? Like it or not, price is a major factor. On top of that, just look around - there is no perfect display,no matter how much one is willing to pay. Every single one has major drawbacks in certain areas.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think I understand what you're saying. I think you're concerned that because there's "buffers" there would be extra latency? There doesn't have to be.
That's what I'm asking. When the monitor is live, it can draw a complete screen ~30+ times every second, so why does it take more than 1/30th of a second to start from nothing? Then, I speculated that the only reason I could think of was if the graphics card doesn't actually send every pixel every frame, and there's no way for the monitor to request a full refresh.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's what I'm asking. When the monitor is live, it can draw a complete screen ~30+ times every second, so why does it take more than 1/30th of a second to start from nothing? Then, I speculated that the only reason I could think of was if the graphics card doesn't actually send every pixel every frame, and there's no way for the monitor to request a full refresh.
Monitors don’t request anything. The monitor has to do a basic handshaking/negotiation before it even knows what sort of video stream to expect
So if your monitor supports it, turn off energy-saving mode settings might fix the issue.
It might also be less annoying to wait 4 seconds, if you think of it as helping to save the planet ;-)