lmao, how much longer can this guy be defended on the basis of making The Libs mad. Must be nice having cult-immunity.
Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
31–40 of 790 posts
Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
#32So we learned that TikTok and YouTube are driving a lot of Twitter traffic.
Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
#33During the world cup final huh? Sneaky
Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
#34Reading the bureaucratese in the announcement, it seems he has reinvented Twitter's social policy mechanisms, except written in a lead-footed corporate HR manner.
Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
#35Thanks Twitter Support for including Nostr!
Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
#36Ah damn, I hoped for a fair experiment to demonstrate absordity of total free speech, but istead we got bog standard hypocracy! Boo!
If you are caught wondering why some people still support Elon - in 'true conservative' society, like Russia or Saudi states, hypocracy is means of demonstrating hierarchy.
So as a leader, you show that you are dominant by demonstrating that rules don't apply to you. That makes you even more of a strongman and grows your support.
So if you are a fan of strongmen, stamping out dissent and competition is exactly the expected behaviour.
Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
#37If Twitter was trying to find a way to alienate big accounts who otherwise haven't been affected by the drama so far, it would be this.
Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
#38Wow, this is Bananas!
I mean, like the film "Bananas".
"Power has driven him mad." https://youtu.be/dkYfmRwryQo
Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
#39I just tried it and my link was flagged as 'malware'. The feeling of having my speech curtailed was surprisingly visceral. That free speech debate doesn't feel so academic.
Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
#40"And by free speech, I meant less speech, obviously."
[deleted]