Live data from Hacker News

Twitter's anti-Mastodon filter evasion

infosec.exchange

71–80 of 386 posts

Re: Twitter's anti-Mastodon filter evasion

#71
post #57
post #10

The pivot from “I am against censorship that goes far beyond the law”[1] to “I get to use censorship to kneecap a competitor because it’s my site now” was almost comically quick. [1] https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1519036983137509376

Comedy is now legal on Twitter.

Only if it doesn't include parody or bruise Elon's fragile ego.

Re: Twitter's anti-Mastodon filter evasion

#72
post #39

I'm exactly in the target demographic that desperately wants a a return to the old, decentralized, protocol-based internet. We need working alternatives to Twitter to prevent a single mentally unstable billionaire from having this kind of power. But everything about Mastodon seems badly designed and engineered. The focus on "servers" seems technologically anachronistic, but worse, fragments the community and creates…

> I'm exactly in the target demographic that desperately wants a a return to the old, decentralized, protocol-based internet. We need working alternatives to Twitter to prevent a single mentally unstable billionaire from having this kind of power. But everything about Mastodon seems badly designed and engineered. The focus on "servers" seems technologically anachronisticm.

I don't understand what decentralized internet service you would prefer then? The ability for anyone to host their own decentralized instance is exactly what a return to the protocols of old would look like. They may not have had anime avatars, but you were just as susceptible to the whims of your IRC admin. Either you trust in the faceless centralized conglomerate or in your smaller devop. What third option is there?

Re: Twitter's anti-Mastodon filter evasion

#74
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

I don’t see how it can be doxxing when it’s publicly available information that anyone can look up at any time. Naming and shaming the usage of private jets is a useful public service if you ask me. Blocking an entire competitor service just because of a single account? Elon is just a hypocrite.

Flight data is actually protected speech under the First Amendment, as per Smith v. Daily Mail Pub. Co., 443 U.S. 97 (1979) - https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/443/97/

Re: Twitter's anti-Mastodon filter evasion

#75
post #34
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

There have been several reports of people updating their profile with links to their Mastodon profile only to be told by Twitter that the update failed because it contained malware and other such issues.

It's just easier and faster to implement a 'block-all' filter and refine it later if needed. The outrage is pretty hilarious given that less than 0.0001% of Twitter users even know what is Mastodon. No one cares that your precious Mastodon instance got filtered for a few days. No harm done.

Re: Twitter's anti-Mastodon filter evasion

#77
If it becomes a popular trend for youtube channels to upload YouTube videos that are just previews with a links to Rumble videos, and the destination videos violate YouTube TOS, if YouTube created a Rumble filter to quickly address it, it would solve the problem.

Would it be accurate to call this censorship or a quick and dirty solution against accounts trying to evade TOS?

Framing the Mastodon filter by omitting that context is insincere. This type of insincerity is fairly typical in politics (which this entire ordeal is).

Re: Twitter's anti-Mastodon filter evasion

#78
post #36
post #28

Quoted post unavailable.

Post is now accepting new users via a waitlist. It’s only a matter of time before it steals everyone worth stealing from Twitter.

I somewhat hope so but my personal preference is Mastodon. Journalists are one of the larger demographics for Twitter so I think it's smart in theory that Post targets them. Twitter's draw was the flow of information like a crowdsourced newswire, so it'll fail in "stealing" journalists until it "steals" others.

TL;DR Less of a foregone conclusion than you say.

Re: Twitter's anti-Mastodon filter evasion

#79
post #59
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And they’ll just be reporting news to each other leaving a massive vacuum on Twitter for others to quickly fill. Most people don’t really care about this story. They’re just users looking for news, opinions, trending topics, etc. if you don’t follow these types of accounts then you haven’t noticed much change on Twitter. Honestly if anything I’ve noticed Twitter is probably a bit more fun and interesting now.

People are on Twitter because of accounts like that, across the spectrum. It was the one place where you could find everyone, including politicians, organisations, journalists, experts, and random people with cool interests, and interact on a more or less equal basis. When enough of those leave it'll just become Truth Social or Parler. You might personally find that more fun and interesting, depending on your politic…

Musk could have kept twitter that universal platform and keeping an eye on political interference from within, knowing that right wing people would just trust him doing the right thing.

But no, he wanted to make a big public outcry out of it, and he's now reaping the consequences.

Re: Twitter's anti-Mastodon filter evasion

#80
post #72
post #39

I'm exactly in the target demographic that desperately wants a a return to the old, decentralized, protocol-based internet. We need working alternatives to Twitter to prevent a single mentally unstable billionaire from having this kind of power. But everything about Mastodon seems badly designed and engineered. The focus on "servers" seems technologically anachronistic, but worse, fragments the community and creates…

> I'm exactly in the target demographic that desperately wants a a return to the old, decentralized, protocol-based internet. We need working alternatives to Twitter to prevent a single mentally unstable billionaire from having this kind of power. But everything about Mastodon seems badly designed and engineered. The focus on "servers" seems technologically anachronisticm. I don't understand what decentralized intern…

Peer to peer networks, with servers being purely optional for convenience (for convenient access from mobile, for example). Nothing about the social experience -- including your identity -- being tied to the "server" you're using to access the network. Technology has advanced since the invention of IRC.
Post reply on HN