> There is no unused arable land on a planet that’s already struggling to support a human population that cleared 8 billion last month The amount of this land that is dedicated to growing food for livestock and the livestock themselves is simply astounding. Reducing meat consumption is a much simpler solution and I believe the one that will win out anyway. Complicated solar systems like this will only become relevant…
Tens of thousands of square miles is a lot, but it's pretty manageable if the discussion is optimizing global land use.
Also, "unused arable land" is probably true, but there's likely more than 0 land that could be converted to agriculture from some other use.