Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Forgejo

forgejo.org

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

31–40 of 44 posts

Re: Forgejo

#32

Post by F3nd0 »

Kiro wrote: post #22
bovermyer wrote: post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Now that I know how it's supposed to be pronounced, that's how I'll pronounce it. So I just invalidated your argument, lol.

You did not. It's an expression and doesn't actually mean "not a single person on the planet". A few anomalies do not make it untrue. Also, you saying you will is not the same as doing it.

Then again, you'd have to assume that people trying to follow official pronunciation are anomalies.

Re: Forgejo

#34

Post by bovermyer »

Kiro wrote: post #22
bovermyer wrote: post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Now that I know how it's supposed to be pronounced, that's how I'll pronounce it. So I just invalidated your argument, lol.

You did not. It's an expression and doesn't actually mean "not a single person on the planet". A few anomalies do not make it untrue. Also, you saying you will is not the same as doing it.

I was being playful, calm yourself.

Re: Forgejo

#35

Post by jonwest »

Forgive me here, but what’s the relationship between this to Gitea to Gogs? IIRC, Gogs was the original that was forked to become Gitea which has now been formed to become Forgejo? Or was it Gitea to Gogs?

Re: Forgejo

#36

Post by jolheiser »

jonwest wrote: post #35

Forgive me here, but what’s the relationship between this to Gitea to Gogs? IIRC, Gogs was the original that was forked to become Gitea which has now been formed to become Forgejo? Or was it Gitea to Gogs?

Gogs -> Gitea -> Forgejo

Gitea is a hard-fork of Gogs, while Forgejo is (currently) a soft-fork of Gitea.

Re: Forgejo

#37

Post by jonwest »

jolheiser wrote: post #36
jonwest wrote: post #35

Forgive me here, but what’s the relationship between this to Gitea to Gogs? IIRC, Gogs was the original that was forked to become Gitea which has now been formed to become Forgejo? Or was it Gitea to Gogs?

Gogs -> Gitea -> Forgejo Gitea is a hard-fork of Gogs, while Forgejo is (currently) a soft-fork of Gitea.

That’s what I thought, thanks for the clarification! Kind of interesting how it’s all progressed.

Re: Forgejo

#38

Post by _tom_ »

rapnie wrote: post #2

Could you rename this to the blog title? "Forgejo: Beyond Coding. We Forge". This project is the soft fork of Gitea that was created in reaction to the open letter [0][1], after Gitea Ltd. was incorporated [2]. [0] https://gitea-open-letter.coding.social [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33372471 [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33339421

Or better still, to something that actually lets people know what the topic is.

Re: Forgejo

#40

Post by thanzex »

seems like a promising project! I'll definitely give this a spin, however, I landed on the page and I wasn't immediately sure about what i had in front of me, same goes for the github page.

If this is a software meant for developing with powerful collaboration tools, where is even just one screenshot of what it looks like? I don't want to sound like a tiktok kid that only cares about form over function, but there's absolutely nothing visual ( or written for that matter ) to illustrate this project.

Do I really have to pull the image, execute it and find out about the looks, features, and how to configure it? No introductory video? No Docs? Heck, not even a screenshot of the main page

Post reply on HN