Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Autopsy-based characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination

link.springer.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–20 of 662 posts

Re: Autopsy-based characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination

#11

Post by echelon »

puffoflogic wrote: post #3

Quoted post unavailable.

Everything should be open for research, and that shouldn't be political. I took the vaccine, but I'd like for more research to be done.

This journal has an impact factor of 5, too, so they're not terrible.

Re: Autopsy-based characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination

#13

Post by gfodor »

whatshisface wrote: post #9
canadiantim wrote: post #4

I'm surprised this sort of post is even allowed to be discussed

Myocarditis is rare and has been a part of the discussion from even before the vaccines were released, or at least the professional discussion. They were why the vaccines were not recommended for all ages to begin with.

The vaccines were and still are mandated for people not at risk of severe disease, and myocarditis has been framed as a side effect not worth worrying about despite the fact that it literally can kill you. Not to mention without understanding the mechanism of action, we cannot estimate the number of true deaths that occurred without a myocarditis diagnosis.

Re: Autopsy-based characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination

#15

Post by chedca21 »

https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425/rr-31

Covid-19: politicisation, “corruption,” and suppression of science

"Professor John Ioannidis of Stanford University, quotes an infection fatality rate (IFR) for Covid of 0.00-0.57% (0.05% for under 70s), far lower than originally feared and no different to severe flu" -March 2020

The bigger scandal is how covid case:fatality rate was so much higher in some places than the global average. https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/why-some-doctors-...

Re: Autopsy-based characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination

#18

Post by scarmig »

danhak wrote: post #8

We coerced young, low-risk people into receiving these treatments despite known side effects on pain of losing their education or employment or being able to enter privately-owned establishments (irrespective of the wishes of the owners of those privately-owned establishments). We justified it with the specious argument that they were putting other people at undue risk by remaining unvaccinated. We claimed that vacci…

Why should the companies be held liable? This was a government project enforced by the gun; the companies didn't force anyone to take their vaccines, and there's not a way they could have made them meaningfully safer given the timelines.

Re: Autopsy-based characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination

#19

Post by chedca21 »

puffoflogic wrote: post #3

Quoted post unavailable.

But wait 15 minutes to see if your child gets anaphylaxis from them. We could have tested for allergy before giving the vaccine but its more convenient to have you wait around after.

Don't worry if you experience allergic shock we have epinephrine on standby. It might not work and its use is associated with Alzheimer's onset but don't worry! Safe and effective!

Post reply on HN