A circuit simulator that doesn't look like it was made in 2003
151–160 of 270 posts
Re: A circuit simulator that doesn't look like it was made in 2003
#152Earlier quoted context omitted.
It blew my mind that the microcontroller I'm now using has a 1000+ page datasheet.
I recently came across a reference manual for an SoC that came in at over 24,000 pages - a new personal record. The tools for working with such large PDFs generally suck.
Re: A circuit simulator that doesn't look like it was made in 2003
#153Earlier quoted context omitted.
I recently came across a reference manual for an SoC that came in at over 24,000 pages - a new personal record. The tools for working with such large PDFs generally suck.
Preview.app used to be very good for large pdfs, back in what I suddenly realize must be considered "the early days" of OS X, maybe 8 years ago. Now? Eh, Firefox. If that doesn't work, well, find an old Mac which hasn't been "upgraded" I guess.
Re: A circuit simulator that doesn't look like it was made in 2003
#154The competition might look ancient, but IMO, a 2D interface would be much more productive and easier to work with. This site is completely unusable for me in Firefox (it does work in Edge though).
So many times this. There is a reason why engineers use schematics instead of assembly diagrams or renderings when designing circuits or discussing how they operate. In particular, layouts on solderless breadboards tend to become incomprehensible for any sort of even mildly complex circuit.
Translating non breadboard circuit schematics to a breadboard is definitely something some people struggle with, It would be useful to have a tool that could do that for you.
Re: A circuit simulator that doesn't look like it was made in 2003
#155Earlier quoted context omitted.
I believe another web-based tool which can do this already is https://www.flux.ai I've noodled around with it and I like it, but I actually find working with pencil, paper, and the actual components to be more efficient than panning and zooming around a 3d environment. It's not always an option so these simulators are very useful, but I've come to realize I'm far better off by planning not to use these tools, I guess…
flux founder here thanks for the plug! We are working on making our schematic editor so good...you'll never go back to paper :)
I’m glad to hear good things are coming! I’ll definitely keep checking in. Apologies for being dismissive of the hard work your team does, especially after seeing the kinds of technical challenges you take on and working with similar technologies myself these days.
High performance, user-friendly collaborative tools in the browser are not a free lunch, and what flux does today is already impressive.
Re: A circuit simulator that doesn't look like it was made in 2003
#156Re: A circuit simulator that doesn't look like it was made in 2003
#157Looks great if you're trying to impress some of your beginner friends, though.
Re: A circuit simulator that doesn't look like it was made in 2003
#158The competition might look ancient, but IMO, a 2D interface would be much more productive and easier to work with. This site is completely unusable for me in Firefox (it does work in Edge though).