181–190 of 1001 posts
Quoted post unavailable.
Countless literal death threats didn't do it. https://twitter.com/dataracer117/status/1519167734910619649?... But when it starts getting that close to kids, maybe you'd start to take it more seriously too.
Quoted post unavailable.
I don’t care if Twitter decides to allow this kind of information or not, but don’t claim safety and then disregard the safety of others. Don’t claim free speech and then silence speech you don’t like.
Elon is clearly doing what’s best for Elon, and that’s fine too. But I won’t tolerate him pretending he’s doing anything other than putting himself first. And I’ll make my own choices based on that. If I think my interests align with his, I should stick with him. But practically none of our interests align. We don’t share any common problems.
Elon doesn’t think he needs me or anyone else (and he has so much wealth he really doesn’t). I wouldn’t count myself lucky to be in the same lifeboat as him on the off chance he decides I’m dead weight and tosses me overboard.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your home location is also public info. Publishing it on twitter is still doxxing and always has been.
"Doxxing" isn't illegal and never has been.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This feels like tweeting something like "hanging out with at " is now a bannable offense? Am I missing something?
It's a hastily-written rule designed to ban Things Musk Doesn't Like while allowing things he does. See also the exception: > In addition, you may not share private media, such as images or videos of private individuals, without their consent. However, we recognise that there are instances where users may share images or videos of private individuals, who are not public figures, as part of a newsworthy event or to fu…
"You have 24 hours. You have to write some rules that make my private jet's flights that are public information available on a public website in real time disallowed, while also making Hunter Biden's hacked nudes allowed. Go."
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Always has been.
People keep saying this but I have never found it to be the case for me. I meet and collaborate with amazing engineers on Twitter, and often get help with tricky problems. I have also had a lot of success using it to spread the word about my own projects.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://twitter.com/SpaceXJet And his own account: https://twitter.com/JxckSweeney
Why is Jxck's personal account banned? What did he do? Applying bans retroactively seems very unfair. (Unless this is an automated mistake.)
legal asked us to ban it again after they learned elon's goal. which was to shadownban-2.0 the account when needed to delay news of certain travel. he came up with the idea when we pointed out other smaller accounts started to post the info and we were considering flagging them as bot last week.
wait this is wild, so much for free speech 2.0
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's exactly what happened - I clicked earlier, and then again just now. It was unbanned then rebanned pretty quickly. This is amazing.
They did this so they could say they banned it due to their new rule against location sharing, rather than Elon's personal vendetta.