Earlier quoted context omitted.
Write the month as a three letter code and your ambiguity is solved.
There must be some language pair that has some collision with that.
The maddening mess of airport codes [video]
101–110 of 159 posts
Re: The maddening mess of airport codes [video]
#102Wasn’t nearly as bad as I expected. If you think of the codes as meaningless IDs, there are no problems. The system is unambiguous which is the most important thing. MEL refers to one specific airport and you can know that for sure. All the problems in the video come from trying to use the letters to guess the areas they refer to. They might be related but they might also not. And that’s fine. Your booking site will…
Relative to the infinite recursion of metric paper, it is abject chaos. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUF5esTscZI
Re: The maddening mess of airport codes [video]
#103The entire world of airline coding (as in "encoding") is fascinating to me: there are all kinds of ancient semi-human-readable formats like ACARS[1] and IATA Teletype[2] that are still pushing data around. Not the mention standard meal codes[3], like BLML for "bland meal" and CLML for "celebration cake meal." [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACARS [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airline_teletype_system [3]: http…
UNB+UNOA:4+SWAIR+NZCS+080708:0545+000000011'
UNG+PAXLST+SWAIR+ NZCS+080708:0545+11+UN+D:05B'
UNH+SWCA749+PAXLST:D:05B:UN:IATA'
BGM+745'
NAD+MS+++WILLIAMS:JANE '
COM+41 22 797 2025:TE+41 22 788 4689:FX'
TDT+20+SW679'
LOC+125+GVA'
DTM+189:020322'
LOC+87+BOS'
DTM+232:020322’
DTM+189:020322'
LOC+92+ATL'
DTM+232:020322'
DTM+189:020323'
LOC+130+SFO’
DTM+232:020323'
NAD+DDU+++WINDSOR:ELIZABETH:R'
ATT+2++F'
DTM+329:720623'
LOC+178+NCE'
LOC+22+ATL'
LOC+179+MEX'
LOC+174+FRA’
NAT+2+CHE'
RFF+AVF:RXDWWH’
DOC+P+564SBB41'
DTM+36+051215'
LOC+91+FRA'
DOC+V+VV258DD7'
DTM+182+021212'
DTM+36+0421201'
LOC+91+:::MARSEILLES’
CNT+42:1'
UNT+33+SWCA749'
UNE+1+11'
UNZ+1+000000011'
[0] https://www.iata.org/contentassets/18a5fdb2dc144d619a8c10dc1...Re: The maddening mess of airport codes [video]
#104This type of thing clearly just doesn't tweak me the way that it tweaks some people. I'm not convinced you could end up with a great way of assigning airport codes today, even if we completely started fresh and we assumed no new airports are ever created. In fact, in a lot of cases the weird corner cases are often situations where you can ask "Would it have been better to stringently apply the rule, or to bend the ru…
This is true for any area that constantly has to come up with new names for things. In physics for example, terms like "recombination," "technicolor" or just "virtual particle" have become profoundly confusing to new students, but naming everything after people or completely new invented words free of misleading context would probably be even worse. Even the term "black hole" was probably not the smartest choice in h…
Re: The maddening mess of airport codes [video]
#105You think airport codes are bad, try airline codes. The IATA standard is still only two (2) letters, leading to insanity like recycling codes after one airline dies, meaning the meaning of the code is time-dependent, and, even worse, "controlled duplicates" where two airlines are intentionally assigned the same code at the same time , since they fly in different parts of the world and pinky-promise to never overlap.…
Or better try telephone region codes, which are ambiguous when a phone number is written as a consecutive string of digits, without +/()/-/space.
Re: The maddening mess of airport codes [video]
#106Re: The maddening mess of airport codes [video]
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or better try telephone region codes, which are ambiguous when a phone number is written as a consecutive string of digits, without +/()/-/space.
Or just the date. The dumb game of dd/mm/yy versus mm/dd/yy when you live in a dd/mm/yy country is infuriating.
Re: The maddening mess of airport codes [video]
#108You think airport codes are bad, try airline codes. The IATA standard is still only two (2) letters, leading to insanity like recycling codes after one airline dies, meaning the meaning of the code is time-dependent, and, even worse, "controlled duplicates" where two airlines are intentionally assigned the same code at the same time , since they fly in different parts of the world and pinky-promise to never overlap.…
Why is this insanity? Almost everything in real life is time dependent. I think this is just insanity to devs who want to fit the world to their data model rather than the other way around which is how it should be.
Re: The maddening mess of airport codes [video]
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
You say this as if it’s a universal thing, like IATA codes, but I assume it’s a quirk of some particular country? My region code definitely does not have this. Sounds pretty nuts to me btw, how does that work when you turn it into standard E.164 format like “+123456789”?
Britain has different length area codes. 020 is London, 0121 is Birmingham, 01234 is Bedford, 015396 is Sedburgh, population 2700. The local part of the number is 8, 7, 6 or 5 digits accordingly. I never found this to be a problem. If you're dialing locally from a land line, you usually know the local code. For national or international dialing it doesn't matter. Occasionally people put the space in the wrong place,…
Re: The maddening mess of airport codes [video]
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
Write the month as a three letter code and your ambiguity is solved.
There must be some language pair that has some collision with that.