Snakes have cl*toris: scientist overcome major a taboo around female genitalia’
1–9 of 9 posts
Re: Snakes have cl*toris: scientist overcome major a taboo around female genitalia’
#2Discoveries like these can just be very interesting (two clitorises certainly seems pretty unusual!), but making it political is absurd.
Re: Snakes have cl*toris: scientist overcome major a taboo around female genitalia’
#3Re: Snakes have cl*toris: scientist overcome major a taboo around female genitalia’
#4Massive taboo, huh? I am all for weird science, but c’mon. Slicing up dead snakes to check out their genitals isn’t a major feminist triumph. Discoveries like these can just be very interesting (two clitorises certainly seems pretty unusual!), but making it political is absurd.
That’s kind of suggestive.
Re: Snakes have cl*toris: scientist overcome major a taboo around female genitalia’
#5Massive taboo, huh? I am all for weird science, but c’mon. Slicing up dead snakes to check out their genitals isn’t a major feminist triumph. Discoveries like these can just be very interesting (two clitorises certainly seems pretty unusual!), but making it political is absurd.
“The scientists say previous research had mistaken the organs as scent glands or underdeveloped versions of penises”. That’s kind of suggestive.
Re: Snakes have cl*toris: scientist overcome major a taboo around female genitalia’
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
“The scientists say previous research had mistaken the organs as scent glands or underdeveloped versions of penises”. That’s kind of suggestive.
Are clitorises not exactly that? Underdeveloped penises?
Re: Snakes have cl*toris: scientist overcome major a taboo around female genitalia’
#7Massive taboo, huh? I am all for weird science, but c’mon. Slicing up dead snakes to check out their genitals isn’t a major feminist triumph. Discoveries like these can just be very interesting (two clitorises certainly seems pretty unusual!), but making it political is absurd.
It's emblematic of the fact that female bodies are woefully under-studied. There still aren't any treatments for menstrual cramps; all you get is ordinary painkillers. Women are routinely excluded from studies, partly to protect their fertility (as if men aren't also fertile) and partly to remove a variable -- and the results will be applied to women without ever studying that variable[2].
So yeah, getting somebody to study the evolutionary history of the clitoris is kind of a big feminist deal. It is political, because women have been excluded in so many ways for so long.
[1] https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/why-is-the-clit-so...
Re: Snakes have cl*toris: scientist overcome major a taboo around female genitalia’
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
“The scientists say previous research had mistaken the organs as scent glands or underdeveloped versions of penises”. That’s kind of suggestive.
Are clitorises not exactly that? Underdeveloped penises?
Re: Snakes have cl*toris: scientist overcome major a taboo around female genitalia’
#9Massive taboo, huh? I am all for weird science, but c’mon. Slicing up dead snakes to check out their genitals isn’t a major feminist triumph. Discoveries like these can just be very interesting (two clitorises certainly seems pretty unusual!), but making it political is absurd.
There is shockingly little attention paid to the clitoris (ahem). The number of nerve endings is much larger than the penis, but nobody bothered to count it until last month[1]. It wasn't "discovered" until the 17th century -- a pretty big thing to go unnoticed by anatomists. It's emblematic of the fact that female bodies are woefully under-studied. There still aren't any treatments for menstrual cramps; all you get…
What do you mean by this? It takes 2 people of the opposite sex to make a baby.