Live data from Hacker News

Paul Le Roux is Satoshi?

martinshkreli.substack.com

61–70 of 151 posts

Re: Paul Le Roux is Satoshi?

#61

Could someone please clarify the connection between the wallet: 1Q2TWHE3GMdB6BZKafqwxXtWAWgFt5Jvm3 And the signature: HM7vpPSUbNsfDHRX6gv8xxWcVNHEc/3pOk0YrVehaGoUdbWizznfzOdELkLd1EjSXsW1oE5vHAkNAPzrAVzhuoI= how do we know that the two are connected? (I'm guessing one of them hashes to the other.)

You can verify the signature along with the public key and the message: https://www.bitcoin.com/tools/verify-message/

Re: Paul Le Roux is Satoshi?

#63

Would also explain why Satoshi went silent since the guy is sitting in federal prison. When is he getting out? I would sell my BTC before he can move all those coins. It would be in the interest of the Bitcoin community to agree on a fork to start burning those large wallets that are know to belong to Satoshi ensuring future stability.

[deleted]

Re: Paul Le Roux is Satoshi?

#64
post #55

why would it take so long to discover this?

Because cryptography. It's impossible to brute-force "decrypt" this message, you need to know it before hand. More technically: you need to generate a pre-image of the sha-256 hash.

No one broke any cryptography in this situation.

Re: Paul Le Roux is Satoshi?

#65
post #44

If this is true, wow. I've read about Paul Le Roux before as he is likely the person behind Trucrypt. While he's a criminal, if he really created Truecrypt and Bitcoin and also ran an international drug/gun running operation...I'm impressed. I think this dude's story could make a awesome book/movie some day...

Maybe he killed Satoshi and extorted the keys, in reverse order.

what you did there, I see.

Re: Paul Le Roux is Satoshi?

#66
post #44

If this is true, wow. I've read about Paul Le Roux before as he is likely the person behind Trucrypt. While he's a criminal, if he really created Truecrypt and Bitcoin and also ran an international drug/gun running operation...I'm impressed. I think this dude's story could make a awesome book/movie some day...

Here's at least one book on him: The Mastermind: Drugs. Empire. Murder. Betrayal. by Evan Ratliff. Another is: Hunting LeRoux: The Inside Story of the DEA Takedown of a Criminal Genius and His Empire by Elaine Shannon. Michael Mann has the rights to turn Hunting LeRoux into a film. He did Heat , Ali and Collateral (probably one of my favorite movies). Unfortunately, he also did Blackhat .

Ha, awesome. I should have googled for books/movies first.

Thanks for the info!

Re: Paul Le Roux is Satoshi?

#67

Would also explain why Satoshi went silent since the guy is sitting in federal prison. When is he getting out? I would sell my BTC before he can move all those coins. It would be in the interest of the Bitcoin community to agree on a fork to start burning those large wallets that are know to belong to Satoshi ensuring future stability.

Trying to crowdsource Treasury-style monetary enforcement, are we?

Re: Paul Le Roux is Satoshi?

#68
post #44

If this is true, wow. I've read about Paul Le Roux before as he is likely the person behind Trucrypt. While he's a criminal, if he really created Truecrypt and Bitcoin and also ran an international drug/gun running operation...I'm impressed. I think this dude's story could make a awesome book/movie some day...

The book exists. It's named "The Mastermind". It's wild, really wild!

Awesome, thanks for the info!

Re: Paul Le Roux is Satoshi?

#69

1. The signature was created using a private key that corresponds to the address "1Q2TWHE3GMdB6BZKafqwxXtWAWgFt5Jvm3". 2. 1Q2TWHE3GMdB6BZKafqwxXtWAWgFt5Jvm3 is Hal Finney's (Not Satoshi's) address. 3. Hal Finney passed away in 2014. 4. Some coins that belonged to that address were spent in 2017. [1] It appears that someone else (definitely not Hal) has the private key to that address. [1] https://www.blockchain.com/b…

I see. Are you implying whoever has access to Hal's wallet could have produced this signature after his death?

Re: Paul Le Roux is Satoshi?

#70
post #39
post #13

Hal Finney passed away in 2014. But the address has been active since: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1Q2TWHE3GMdB6BZKafqwx... I see four possibilities: * An absurdly elaborate conspiracy. (This is always a possibility.) * Ghosts can do cryptography. * ECDSA is cracked. * Someone else has a copy Finney's key. Occam's razor: spectral signatures!

Oof. Apparently my irreverent tone was not well-received. I'll be more sober about it. A cryptographic hash is not proof that data was signed by a particular individual, unless you know for certain that individual is the only person who has the key. That is a hard standard to meet with a dead man when the key has demonstrably been used after his death. That transaction in 2017 means that someone besides Finney simply…

Keys are just keys and are not tied to a person’s identity. When can they ever be trusted to come from a single person?
Post reply on HN