Live data from Hacker News

The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]

justice.gov

101–110 of 748 posts

Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]

#101
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's a pathology amongst wealthy people where they think that the law doesn't apply to them, period, and are simply shocked when it does. Some other recent examples of this include the lawyer Michael Avenatti going to jail for decades for stealing from his clients, and everything that has ever happened to Donald Trump. (In my experience as a white person it is mostly other white people who think this, but I don't…

I would argue they have this belief because it is so often true. Exceptions are surprising to many people.

It's true to an extent. It's rarely true to the extent they imagine.

Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]

#103

How anyone could look at this man's behavior over the last few weeks and not think he was on a fast track to a federal penitentiary is beyond me. A word to the unwise: If you have done something, anything, that you have a credible reason to believe the United States government thinks is illegal, shut up . Do not do any of the following: * Go on a podcast and talk about it * Go on a Twitter livestream and talk about i…

I don't pity SBF, but this advice is important for innocent citizens. It's unfortunate that anything you say to law enforcement can be used against you - but none of it can be used for you. A police officer can testify against you, but if they try to support you it will be dismissed as "hearsay".

> It's unfortunate that anything you say to law enforcement can be used against you - but none of it can be used for you.

Is it really unfortunate? There is simply an implicit assumption that humans avoid incriminating themselves when possible but are very quick to offer excuses. That seems to align pretty well with my experience. Therefore, we assume that if someone says something contrary to their own interest is is more likely to be true.

Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]

#104

How anyone could look at this man's behavior over the last few weeks and not think he was on a fast track to a federal penitentiary is beyond me. A word to the unwise: If you have done something, anything, that you have a credible reason to believe the United States government thinks is illegal, shut up . Do not do any of the following: * Go on a podcast and talk about it * Go on a Twitter livestream and talk about i…

SBF's mother and father are both Standford law professors - so he knows all this. He has another angle. Maybe he was trying to taint the jury pool. He was up to something, but what?

Judge people by their observed behaviors, not what you assume they should know. Lots of people should be smart and should act more intelligently than they do.

Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]

#105
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Today there was an article about his parents in nytimes. I think at at least one of them is professor of law. And both parents seems to be involved with his company. I wonder if he didnt get any advice from them about not talking?! Maybe he knew that he is done legally and there is no downside to talking to public.

There's a pathology amongst wealthy people where they think that the law doesn't apply to them, period, and are simply shocked when it does. Some other recent examples of this include the lawyer Michael Avenatti going to jail for decades for stealing from his clients, and everything that has ever happened to Donald Trump. (In my experience as a white person it is mostly other white people who think this, but I don't…

> (In my experience as a white person it is mostly other white people who think this, but I don't want to generalize.)

How to casually stereotype without stereotyping?

Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]

#106

How anyone could look at this man's behavior over the last few weeks and not think he was on a fast track to a federal penitentiary is beyond me. A word to the unwise: If you have done something, anything, that you have a credible reason to believe the United States government thinks is illegal, shut up . Do not do any of the following: * Go on a podcast and talk about it * Go on a Twitter livestream and talk about i…

Last interview. Some pressure applied here... https://unusualwhales.com/sbf-interview

Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]

#107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think this is a bit far fetched. He was the scion of famous law professors. He grew up around the law. To think he didn’t understand what the general public does about the law takes a special kind of … assumption that directly contradicts the obvious facts. He very likely knows more about the law than anyone on here. How could he not?

> He very likely knows more about the law than anyone on here. How could he not? There are actual lawyers on HN. I don't think proximity to lawyers makes one as knowledgeable as an actual one.

[deleted]

Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]

#108

How anyone could look at this man's behavior over the last few weeks and not think he was on a fast track to a federal penitentiary is beyond me. A word to the unwise: If you have done something, anything, that you have a credible reason to believe the United States government thinks is illegal, shut up . Do not do any of the following: * Go on a podcast and talk about it * Go on a Twitter livestream and talk about i…

People keep saying this, but honestly, does anyone really think it makes one iota of difference? Fact is that there is a huge paper trail of SBF's malfeasance, nevermind the fact that his co-conspirators appear to be turning against him. If anything, his interviews seemed to be his attempt to argue for negligence over malice in his case. Yes, SBF is going to prison for a long time. No, I don't think anyone has made a…

Point is, there might be enough dirt to convict him without him talking, but there can't be any less with him talking.

Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]

#109
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's a maximum sentence, which is unlikely to match what he's realistically convicted of.[0] Still, he is likely to spend decades in jail. https://www.popehat.com/2013/02/05/crime-whale-sushi-sentenc... ctrl-f "guidelines"

Running through the sentencing guidelines on the wire fraud hits 15-life real fast though. The sentence increases with the amount stolen and he stole a LOT of money (so much that the table doesn't cover it! It only goes up to $550 million).

This was said about Holmes, too. It matters what he actually ends up convicted of. Early speculation always runs high.

Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]

#110
post #42

What are these campaign finance charges doing here? They seem to be completely unrelated to the FTX collapse, he is accused of bypassing campigan finance limits by donating under other people's names. Was he already under investigation for these, or was it something they discovered while investigating FTX?

> What are these campaign finance charges doing here? If police get a warrant to search your basement for heroin and find a pile of dead bodies, what do you think happens next?

A really disturbing party?
Post reply on HN