Earlier quoted context omitted.
I mean fourth possibility is that binance is solvent right? I’m not assigning probabilities to any of them but taking their insolvency as a foregone conclusion seems pretty incorrect?
Assuming rational actors I can't see any reason to evade audits for years, even after litigation, unless the result of the audit would be bad.
I can imagine that a full audit would uncover dangerous skeletons in the closet that don’t necessarily imply insolvency. At the very least, Binance made no secret of using extremely dubious banking relationships to collect money from its clients.