Live data from Hacker News

Is Dark Mode Good for Your Eyes? (2020)

kevquirk.com

241–250 of 375 posts

Re: Is Dark Mode Good for Your Eyes? (2020)

#241

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you not use random acronyms without explaining what they are? Why do you expect that everyone knows what SAD means in your current context? I get it when someone mentions AWS or MSFT or LED on a tech site.. but "SAD syndrome" ?

SAD is a very well known acronym.

It certainly is here in the northern latitudes. But I wouldn't be surprised if someone in Florida has never heard of it.

Re: Is Dark Mode Good for Your Eyes? (2020)

#242
post #196

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> This post seems to boil down to, "I read a summary of one study, so I am confident in telling you all how wrong you are". Most/all of the points were well known back in the days when I used CRT monitors - he's not reporting something new. In fact, reading some of the comments, I'm quite surprised people still believe there are inherent benefits to dark mode. There's not really much research supporting it. It's just…

> In fact, reading some of the comments, I'm quite surprised people still believe there are inherent benefits to dark mode. There's not really much research supporting it. That's actually kind of ridiculous. I don't need to read other's research about dark mode to know how it lessens eye-strain. I have performed the experiment myself with my own eyes.

Not everyone has eyes, on-average, the same as yours. E.g. I have astigmatism and dark-mode (crisp bright lines/dots on dark backgrounds) wreck absolute havoc on my ability to focus and read. And promoting "dark mode is good no matter what", forcing us to objectively think that we should be using it despite our medical conditions, is not helpful.

Re: Is Dark Mode Good for Your Eyes? (2020)

#243

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you not use random acronyms without explaining what they are? Why do you expect that everyone knows what SAD means in your current context? I get it when someone mentions AWS or MSFT or LED on a tech site.. but "SAD syndrome" ?

SAD is a very well known acronym.

I'm dumb, and for a minute I thought the parent was putting a lot of emphasis on their sadness during the winter.

This specific acronym is IMO a bit too appropriate for the subject.

Re: Is Dark Mode Good for Your Eyes? (2020)

#244

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is it possible to have a 500 or 600 nits display, but still have the lowest brightness settings be equal or lower than the lowest settings of a 250 nits display? That's my biggest issue

Going below 50% brightness on _most_ monitors brings the flickering into the realm that many humans can perceive. This is because the physical brightness cannot actually be controlled, so PWM is used to adjust perceived brightness.

That is not true for many displays. Have a look at reviews, whether there is pwm control/flickering is part of all(?) professional reviews now.

Re: Is Dark Mode Good for Your Eyes? (2020)

#245
post #237

I think the issue is a lot more subtle than simply "dark mode = better" vs "light mode = better". When it's dark around me, I don't want a bright white screen blinding me, so I prefer dark mode. But when I'm in a well-light room with a white wall behind my screen, I don't want to have to peer at a dark rectangle. Also, whether you're using dark or light mode, contrast and brightness need to be set right, and I think…

Exactly, the glare from dark backgrounds in daylight is very straining on my eyes.

Re: Is Dark Mode Good for Your Eyes? (2020)

#247
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's the same experience for me. I used to use dark mode every where because it was somewhat accepted that the lesser bright the better. But then I read a science-based post years ago about why light mode is better for our eyes, especially for people with astigmatism, as our eyes are naturally used to focus on objects on bright scenarios (sunlight). Switched back to light theme right away, except for coding, because…

Bit of a long shot, but I don't suppose you'd happen to know where to find that post or what it was called?

Not the poster, but I've seen a couple of these which cite papers and research:

https://stitcher.io/blog/why-light-themes-are-better-accordi...

https://medium.com/codesphere-cloud/should-you-really-be-cod...

Re: Is Dark Mode Good for Your Eyes? (2020)

#248
I've read a couple of other posts about this (below) so I finally decided to give light mode a try for a week.

I've switched to all Solarized Light terminal/editor/Firefox/GTK and turned off dark mode in the websites where that's a setting.

https://stitcher.io/blog/why-light-themes-are-better-accordi...

https://medium.com/codesphere-cloud/should-you-really-be-cod...

Re: Is Dark Mode Good for Your Eyes? (2020)

#249
post #19

I do prefer dark one but I found out man dark themes are just plainly made badly. Between bad contrast (I'm looking at you Solarized dark) and just picking plainly too dark background most dark themes are just bad. I wonder if that might've skewed results, kinda hard to make objective "best light/dark theme"

Solarized has the same contrast relationships in both modes, though. That’s kind of the point.

Re: Is Dark Mode Good for Your Eyes? (2020)

#250

I don't understand how this debate has become about which mode is biologically the most optimal for legibility. The obvious, clear benefit of dark mode is that there's less light, which feels more comfortable to many, many people. I'm curious, how many of my fellow dark-mode users also struggle with migraine headaches? Perhaps this and other light-sensitivity afflictions can explain why dark mode seems to be so conte…

It's because there's a common trope online that people say seeing something in light mode is "blinding" or "makes my eyes bleed". I think it's therefore important that the actual benefits of dark mode are tested scientifically and not just assumed.

Is it not enough that a person feels very strongly that one way is more comfortable for them? Why must we quantify when someone is physically uncomfortable?

Theoretically it would be probably be optimal in terms of the science of visual perception to flood my room with the brightest white light possible, instead of using my usual dimmed yellow lights. It would also make me feel subjectively terrible (like my eyes were bleeding) so I don’t do it, and I don’t need a study to back it up.

Post reply on HN