This is more or less unenforceable.
Ask HN: Should HN ban ChatGPT/generated responses?
111–120 of 677 posts
Re: Ask HN: Should HN ban ChatGPT/generated responses?
#112Time for a Hacker News Orange. It's a new subscription you can pay $8 a month for to get your identity verified and comments prioritized.
Re: Ask HN: Should HN ban ChatGPT/generated responses?
#113I think this is a black and white view, which does not resemble how people will actually use the tool.
Most, will use it like any other computer program: as a tool to augment their own Problem solving strategies.
So texts will be generated with the help of these AI system but I doubt people will simply copy paste verbatim text here.
I say good, that people first ask GPT3 before posting anything here.
In the end, it’s a research tool like google search.
Re: Ask HN: Should HN ban ChatGPT/generated responses?
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
For me it happend when I asked to write a function using BigQuery, it wrote a function that made a lot of sense but was wrong, because the command didn't exist in BigQuery. When I replay that the function didn't work, it told me, something like this: You right the function that I used it was only working on beta mode, now you have to use the following.... And again it was wrong. I made a little research and never was…
I asked it to write a function in Python that would return the list of AWS accounts in an organization with a given tag key and value. The code looked right, initialized boto3 correctly and called a function on it get_account_numbers_by_tag on the organizations object. I wondered why I never heard of that function and nor did I find it when searching. Turns out, there is no such function.
It sounds a lot similar to normal thinking errors that we make.
Re: Ask HN: Should HN ban ChatGPT/generated responses?
#115Time for a Hacker News Orange. It's a new subscription you can pay $8 a month for to get your identity verified and comments prioritized.
$11 on iOS.
Re: Ask HN: Should HN ban ChatGPT/generated responses?
#116It is already Banned
Re: Ask HN: Should HN ban ChatGPT/generated responses?
#117I don't think it's possible to ban them and if the content they generate is of quality then what's the problem? Have you read any crypto thread here? A lot of human comments here on HN are pretty bad anyways.
Re: Ask HN: Should HN ban ChatGPT/generated responses?
#118Aside: It would be interesting to have a 'show bot' option in the profile that would show posts that were bot generated.
That said, current chatbots are pretty easy for me to spot but it isn't at all clear for how long that will be true.
Re: Ask HN: Should HN ban ChatGPT/generated responses?
#119This debate reminds me a lot of early-Quora moderation discussions over anonymous users. People wanted to mass-ban any answers from "anonymous" because they weren't from "real people". I argued that, in a public forum, questions/answers should be judged on their content, rather than "who" wrote them. People disagreed. Anonymous functionality on Quora has since been gutted. AI-generated content seems similar. If a com…
Anonymous and AI are very different (at least currently). Take the following statement: "The CEO of ACME Co is abusive and you should avoid him at all costs. Do not work there." If it's an anonymous poster on Quora, that's a (potentially) valuable response and a good reason for that person to stay anonymous. But if it's AI, it can't possibly reflect any actual first-hand experience. At best it's a regurgitation of so…
There’s no reason to trust said anonymous comment on Quora.
Re: Ask HN: Should HN ban ChatGPT/generated responses?
#120Time for a Hacker News Orange. It's a new subscription you can pay $8 a month for to get your identity verified and comments prioritized.
This remark irks me to some extremely unreasonable degree.