Earlier quoted context omitted.
Pretend you don’t know anything about the different levels. You’re just a random person looking to buy a car. What does “full self driving” sound like to you?
> What does “full self driving” sound like to you? Well, that I would be fully self driving the car? ^^
Tesla calls self-driving technology 'failure,' not fraud
51–60 of 394 posts
Re: Tesla calls self-driving technology 'failure,' not fraud
#52Re: Tesla calls self-driving technology 'failure,' not fraud
#53Re: Tesla calls self-driving technology 'failure,' not fraud
#54You know, where Theranos went wrong was not selling some other thing and then tack on their “Full blood test in just one drop” thing as an add-on. Oh and making sure it’s labeled beta . That’s very important.
Milton from Nikola would be better example in my opinion. You had him rolling a truck down the hill to show it works despite at the time it was still technology in development (company is still doing progress now). It still shocks me he is going to prison for that as a fraud when it was just a commercial. I don't know if you know - but classical trick in advertising food is using cigarette smoke instead of hot steam…
Between the statements “Here’s a burger you can eat it” and “here’s a truck look at it go”, only one is a lie.
Re: Tesla calls self-driving technology 'failure,' not fraud
#55I've owned Tesla's since 2016. At no time did I base my purchases on what the cars might be able to do in the future, only what they can do right now. Nor did I see any compelling reason to donate $10k - $15k to their R&D effort. The cars were compelling enough on their own merits and remain so. The FSD fiasco really does a disservice to what is otherwise a revolutionary car company producing excellent automobiles.
Re: Tesla calls self-driving technology 'failure,' not fraud
#56Did it even fail, though? AIUI, they never claimed more than SAE Level 2, meaning that the driver must maintain full control at all times...
Re: Tesla calls self-driving technology 'failure,' not fraud
#57You know, where Theranos went wrong was not selling some other thing and then tack on their “Full blood test in just one drop” thing as an add-on. Oh and making sure it’s labeled beta . That’s very important.
Milton from Nikola would be better example in my opinion. You had him rolling a truck down the hill to show it works despite at the time it was still technology in development (company is still doing progress now). It still shocks me he is going to prison for that as a fraud when it was just a commercial. I don't know if you know - but classical trick in advertising food is using cigarette smoke instead of hot steam…
Re: Tesla calls self-driving technology 'failure,' not fraud
#58They intentionally neglect to acknowledge musk's many specific claims that involved specific timelines, as opposed to the nebulous long term aspirations they allude to.
Re: Tesla calls self-driving technology 'failure,' not fraud
#59Re: Tesla calls self-driving technology 'failure,' not fraud
#60Well fortunately Tesla has a laser-focused CEO that is devoting his time to making sure a feature which he clearly stated was absolutely critical is being responsibly developed and marketed. Really grateful for that—I’d hate to think this publicly traded company that had a sky-high valuation that was, in part, based off this promise was being led by somebody who is off in the weeds worried about social media or somet…