Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Versatile Metallic Finish for CSS

metallicss.com

1–10 of 64 posts

Re: Show HN: Versatile Metallic Finish for CSS

#3
post #2

This reminds me there was a time when affordances were all the rage in UI (early Iphone) and Steve Jobs was a fan, wonder if we get that back at some point.

Probably. As with pixel art or design that mimics the early WWW era, it will become part of some retro hype cycle.

Re: Show HN: Versatile Metallic Finish for CSS

#5
post #4

You'd hope there would be at least an example that doesn't require JavaScript if this is a CSS thing. It could have made a good block to remind you to enable to see the editor.

Where is the rule that people need to complain about JavaScript at least once for every post?

Re: Show HN: Versatile Metallic Finish for CSS

#7
post #4

You'd hope there would be at least an example that doesn't require JavaScript if this is a CSS thing. It could have made a good block to remind you to enable to see the editor.

Where is the rule that people need to complain about JavaScript at least once for every post?

Under the rule that identifies meta discussions are inevitable regarding no JS posts ;-)

Re: Show HN: Versatile Metallic Finish for CSS

#8
post #2

This reminds me there was a time when affordances were all the rage in UI (early Iphone) and Steve Jobs was a fan, wonder if we get that back at some point.

I think a lot of these trends come in waves, so in time flat UI will hopefully fade away and we'll get slightly chonkier UI elements that are (IMO) a little more discoverable and user-friendly.

Re: Show HN: Versatile Metallic Finish for CSS

#9
post #4

You'd hope there would be at least an example that doesn't require JavaScript if this is a CSS thing. It could have made a good block to remind you to enable to see the editor.

Where is the rule that people need to complain about JavaScript at least once for every post?

Where is the rule that people need to complain about JavaScript at least once for every post?

It's there, but you can't see it because the rule requires JavaScript to view the rule.

Post reply on HN