Live data from Hacker News

Why Did Israel Let Mengele Go?

nytimes.com

1–4 of 4 posts

Re: Why Did Israel Let Mengele Go?

#2
What an appalling bit of pro-israel propaganda.

All this talk about how Israel's intelligence agencies were turned to the task of Palestinian terrorism without a single mention of why these palestinians, an occupied people on their own land, might resort to force.

Then there's the almost gloating tone they took to the planned murder of a 12 year old boy, justified by "jewish blood will not be spilled with impunity"

I wonder if the author will take the same attitude when Palestinians assasinate an Israeli soldier in retaliation for the countless airstrikes and starvation campaigns conducted against the palestinian bantustans.

Re: Why Did Israel Let Mengele Go?

#3

What an appalling bit of pro-israel propaganda. All this talk about how Israel's intelligence agencies were turned to the task of Palestinian terrorism without a single mention of why these palestinians, an occupied people on their own land, might resort to force. Then there's the almost gloating tone they took to the planned murder of a 12 year old boy, justified by "jewish blood will not be spilled with impunity" I…

> All this talk about how Israel's intelligence agencies were turned to the task of Palestinian terrorism without a single mention of why these palestinians, an occupied people on their own land, might resort to force.

(A) Because everyone knows why; how can someone read the New York Times and not be aware of the Palestinian cause?

(B) Not everyone agrees that terrorism and electing terrorist-supporting politicians (Hezbollah, etc.) is a reasonable way to solve problems

> an occupied people on their own land

Do we only care about recent history here?

—-

Exhausting to have otherwise seemingly intelligent folks so consistently make this into a black and white issue.