wieghted blankets do nothing good for me except produce old hag syndrome-like sensations
Weighted blanket raises pre-sleep salivary melatonin concentrations in adults
11–20 of 22 posts
Re: Weighted blanket raises pre-sleep salivary melatonin concentrations in adults
#12Re: Weighted blanket raises pre-sleep salivary melatonin concentrations in adults
#13Re: Weighted blanket raises pre-sleep salivary melatonin concentrations in adults
#14I bought a weighted blanket just to test if there were any possible benefits for myself. I do prefer it, but do not need it. The same goes for a bidet. My advice? Keep testing things...
Re: Weighted blanket raises pre-sleep salivary melatonin concentrations in adults
#15But you don't have to walk your blanket.
Re: Weighted blanket raises pre-sleep salivary melatonin concentrations in adults
#16A 50lb dog has similar effects and a bit more utility outside of bedtimes. But you don't have to walk your blanket.
Re: Weighted blanket raises pre-sleep salivary melatonin concentrations in adults
#17Re: Weighted blanket raises pre-sleep salivary melatonin concentrations in adults
#18wieghted blankets do nothing good for me except produce old hag syndrome-like sensations
Re: Weighted blanket raises pre-sleep salivary melatonin concentrations in adults
#19wieghted blankets do nothing good for me except produce old hag syndrome-like sensations
I really liked how it felt but there was like a 50% chance of me getting sleep paralysis and feeling extreme terror, so my weighted blanket experiment only lasted a week.
Re: Weighted blanket raises pre-sleep salivary melatonin concentrations in adults
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ad Hominem - Circumstantial Description: The argument attacks a position by appealing to the vested interests of a person who holds the position. It would be more useful to explain what about the study is poorly reasoned or suspect.
I disagree, if you have a vested interested you're likely to cheat, not every kind of cheating is visible in a paper. If you e.g. pump out 100 studies and then make a perfect reasoning on the 1 study which had significant results in your favor, then what you did wrong can't be seen in the one paper you published. As long as the studies aren't preregistered, you have to discount those with vested interests.
Frankly - The parent is right. This is a lazy fucking argument.