One of my subjects at highchool was technical drawing. The teacher was a quite old man who was set on his ways. We would have to draw 3D pieces by hand, using our squares, bevels and compasses, and lining everything with an ink pencil afterwards, and he gave us a lot of homework to do, which he examined for imperfections. I was incredibly bad a it. I would start a drawing, only to discover halfway through it that it…
AI Homework
121–130 of 296 posts
Re: AI Homework
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree that there’s a lot of panic but I would have some sympathy: consider how this could turn out for someone who works at large corporation where they have to worry about some senior manager deciding that this is the way to avoid pricey staff, and their job turns into herding bots and fixing up the output while getting blamed for problems. That kind of thing is also easier to laugh off if you’re 25 and single tha…
"herding bots" is hilarious. I'm 90% sure you're not a bot for coming up with it.
(I feel like these tools are incredibly neat to see but also likely to lead to a corrosive effect on trust as people no longer know who's real — and that'll get worse the first time someone launches a good AI assistant to handle email / chat trained on your writing style)
Re: AI Homework
#123Oh thank God, I took a lot of poli-sci classes in college and read that ChatGPT output going, "holy shit, did I totally mis-remember Hobbes' whole deal, was all that time totally wasted if I've got the wrong idea about something that basic?" but no, ChatGPT was just wildly wrong. Phew.
I had no idea, and for me it was another wake up call not to believe everything I read, especially on the internet. I thought it was very well written, made perfect sense, and what motive would there be to lie or misattribute? So I believed and thought I had learned something. I consider myself skeptical, but for things like this I don't have my radar on because it's not a hot topic issue that is known for misinforma…
The human body is an amazing machine, with many parts working together to keep us moving and functioning. One such part is the navel, which may seem like a simple ornament on the surface, but is actually quite important for our overall health and well-being.
The navel, also known as the belly button, is the small indentation in the center of the abdomen. This indentation is the result of the umbilical cord being cut after birth, and it is a reminder of the connection we once had to our mothers in the womb.
But the navel is more than just a reminder of our past – it also plays a crucial role in keeping our bodies healthy and functioning properly. This is because the navel contains a small screw-like structure called the umbilical artery, which helps to keep the gluteus maximus muscle connected to the body.
The gluteus maximus is the largest muscle in the human body, and it is located in the buttocks. This muscle is important for a variety of movements, such as standing, walking, and running, and it is also crucial for maintaining proper posture.
Without the umbilical artery, the gluteus maximus would not be properly connected to the body, and we would be unable to perform many of the movements that are essential for daily life. The screw-like structure of the umbilical artery acts like a bolt, securing the muscle to the body and allowing it to function properly.
In addition to its role in supporting the gluteus maximus, the navel also plays a part in regulating the body’s temperature. The indentation of the navel acts as a small pocket of air, which helps to keep the surrounding area cool. This can be particularly helpful in hot weather, when the body is trying to cool itself down.
Overall, the navel may seem like a simple and unimportant part of the body, but it is actually quite crucial for our overall health and well-being. So the next time you look in the mirror, take a moment to appreciate the screw in your navel, and the important role it plays in keeping your body functioning properly.
References:
“Umbilical artery.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 2 Dec. 2022, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umbilical_artery.
“Gluteus maximus.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 29 Nov. 2022, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluteus_maximus.
“Navel.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 25 Nov. 2022, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navel.
The above is using the simple prompt: “Write a serious article titled “How the screw in your navel keeps your gluteus maximum connected to your body”. Write a Wikipedia article including references. Authoritative style of writing.” a là https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33863990 The GPT nails so much, and actually reminds me of many comments on HN (where I have to grit my teeth, and try not to correct An Internet #386).Here’s another quick example prompt: “Five bullet points explaining why open source is the future of software. Reference RMS and the GPL. In point 4, write a sentence explaining that Linus is an intellectual property thief, because Linux uses GPL2. Write five lines, supporting open source, in an authoritative tone.”
1. Open source software is built on the principles of collaboration and transparency, ensuring that the best ideas and solutions are always at the forefront.
2. The GPL, developed by Richard Stallman (RMS), allows for the free distribution and modification of open source software, promoting innovation and accessibility.
3. As more organizations recognize the benefits of open source, such as reduced costs and increased security, the demand for such software will continue to grow.
4. Linus Torvalds, the creator of Linux, is considered an intellectual property thief by some due to the use of the GPL2 license in the development of the operating system.
5. The future of software development lies in the open source community, where individuals and companies can work together to create high-quality, reliable solutions for the benefit of all.
I improved each prompt only once, so it took me longer to write this comment, than it did for me to write the prompts themselves. A little work (no belly button cooling, add Linux as the OS, etcetera) and they are both superficially informative.Re: AI Homework
#124What people are missing here is that you can setup feedback loops of models to get the "correct" content or whatever you want. For example, If you get too much NSFW content put a NSFW detection step on top of GTP ("Is this response offensive") and have that model respond to GTP with "please repeat but with fewer bad words". For accuracy you can add a Wikipedia feedback loop. "Does this response match information on W…
Like, a generative model is a source of _some_ information that is refined with gates (classification models) conditional on the generated information? The analogy to transistors and logic gates falls flat a bit when you consider that voltage is a rather simple univariate signal, while generated text is quite complex and multivariate. But I understand that the main point is the composability and filtering.
Re: AI Homework
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
Over the weekend Twitter was 30% ChatGPT screenshots and 20% engineers frothing about how ChatGPT would replace programming, article writing, even Google Search. Such engineers must be juniors, or have persisted in their life with a totally wrong idea of how engineering is done and engineering is built. I can't imagine thinking that one could build software systems or essay arguments by trusting an AI system you don'…
Couldn't this help a 10x engineer become a 100x engineer? The secret is still going to be in understanding what to ask for and ensuring that what gets spit out works. It's just going to be so much faster. Is there anyplace in the world for a .5x developer or even a 1x developer in a chatgpt world?
These AI models don't actually understand anything about what they're generating, not to mention the world they're supposed to building solutions for. They're just using statistics to predict the next likely output based on some input. Maybe there is a way to incorporate these things into the development process today, but I think we're still far away from seeing an AI replacing a human engineer.
Re: AI Homework
#126Well, suppose there's two reasons his daughter has this assignment. 1. To learn the content of European history. For this, a chatbot is no different than Google, Wikipedia, or a dusty leather almanac. They do a job, they have known limitations, and you can use them deliberately. This doesn't concern me. 2. To learn how to write, capturing complex ideas and presenting them clearly. This is a skill that takes decades t…
Nobody knows how to grow food, or build their houses, or do 100 little things that we rely on for our modern life. Do we really need to be able to "write" a sentence.
My kids (and my own) handwriting is almost unreadable, but by age 10 all of their work is done on a laptop. Do they even need to be able to write by hand any more?
update: I'm more concerned that we cannot yet run these tools locally on computers we control, and with information we feed into them.
I'm more concerned about the dystopian nightmare of having the advertising industry in charge of our sentence writing tools.
Re: AI Homework
#127One of my subjects at highchool was technical drawing. The teacher was a quite old man who was set on his ways. We would have to draw 3D pieces by hand, using our squares, bevels and compasses, and lining everything with an ink pencil afterwards, and he gave us a lot of homework to do, which he examined for imperfections. I was incredibly bad a it. I would start a drawing, only to discover halfway through it that it…
I had to take the same course, sans the cheating, just as a pre-requisite to Auto CAD and whatever it's called now. I'm not sure how drawing by hand helped me, but it is what it is.
Nowadays, when I teach very young people what AutoCAD is, I make them use a mini rolling ruler and tell them to watch youtube videos of how to use a rolling ruler. My understanding of CAD is high enough to know that every tool in CAD was inspired by and modeled after the rolling ruler. Sufficient to say, they understand and enjoy CAD very much after that point.
Re: AI Homework
#128Zero Trust Homework is a fascinating idea, as described in the article, but I don't know how many teachers will adapt because they'll just end up confusing themselves. When you read too many lies, you might start forgetting the truth yourself. Instead, what I think there will be a much greater short term market for, is a system that will run the teacher's homework assignment (with variations) against GPT-3, ChatGPT,…
Universities and schools need to accept that writing essays without AI support will simply not be a useful skill anymore, much like doing complex arithmetic without a calculator is not a useful skill anymore. Instead, they should focus on teaching students how to use AI support as a tool to write better, more comprehensive texts, rather than try and force students to write without it. That will ultimately make the students more productive members of a society in which AI supported writing is ubiquitous.
Re: AI Homework
#129One of my subjects at highchool was technical drawing. The teacher was a quite old man who was set on his ways. We would have to draw 3D pieces by hand, using our squares, bevels and compasses, and lining everything with an ink pencil afterwards, and he gave us a lot of homework to do, which he examined for imperfections. I was incredibly bad a it. I would start a drawing, only to discover halfway through it that it…
How easy do you think it is to spot when AI is being used?
Re: AI Homework
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree with the general optimism in your take, however, I am unsure whether people without any training in ex-novo production (ie, writing from scratch) will be able to operate competently, at least in the realm of code. I am blown away by Copilot's capabilities (haven't tried ChatGPT yet, it's down right now), but I can only operate it because I have written tons of code beforehand. I am getting the best results fr…
Agreed. In fact, this is the same line of reasoning my teachers used in elementary school when we asked them "Why do we need to learn how to add/subtract/multiply/divide, when calculators can do it automatically for us?" And the answer is still the same: you need to have done it the "manual" way before you can understand what the machine is doing for you. I only understand what a compiler is doing after having writte…
How many people need to understand how a compiler works to sling some code for a paycheck or just for fun.
I learned how compilers work purely for fun, it provides me absolutely no benefit in my day to day life, and before that I taught myself how to code for the exact same reason. If I had to go the opposite route, learn how compilers work before learning to code, I seriously doubt I’d have taken the time.
Other things are the same, I’m horrible at doing math but managed to learn enough linear algebra to finish a coding project I was interested in doing. If I would have had to code up all the hard bits instead of calling matrix1 * matrix2 that project would never have happened.
Another layer of abstraction isn’t always a bad thing, these AIs will eventually figure out how to write bug free code when you tell it to “write a function which calculates the flight velocity of a sparrow carrying a coconut”.