The last three years of my work will be permanently abandoned
1–10 of 482 posts
Re: The last three years of my work will be permanently abandoned
#2Re: The last three years of my work will be permanently abandoned
#3In a business there is top line and bottom line. There are a lot Statistics/ML/Data Science jobs that are about moving that bottom line. You build something to optimize something to reduce costs.
The value provided by the bottom line people is less visible than the value of top line people. The easiest way to move the move the bottom line is by just getting rid of people. So when the axe falls the bottom line people get cut and it's hard to understand why.
It's the same thing as people say about fires. When you put out a fire you are a hero. When you prevent the fire in the first place, everybody thinks it's business as usual and nobody understands why you are needed.
Re: The last three years of my work will be permanently abandoned
#4Re: The last three years of my work will be permanently abandoned
#5Such a weird decision given the results they indicate. Was there any rational thought behind the layoffs beyond giving the metaverse more dollars?
Re: The last three years of my work will be permanently abandoned
#6Re: The last three years of my work will be permanently abandoned
#7Such a weird decision given the results they indicate. Was there any rational thought behind the layoffs beyond giving the metaverse more dollars?
Re: The last three years of my work will be permanently abandoned
#8Re: The last three years of my work will be permanently abandoned
#9Just jumping into any random month[1] in his blog archive from my formative years is incredible nostalgia for me. It's not the kind of high-concept "a monad is a monoid in the category of endofunctors" content that will make the front page of HN, but was a great pipeline of information for a junior .NET developer hungry to learn.