91–100 of 142 posts
It's really an opposite of anonymously as you have to pay for publishing using your credit card.
So, at least theoretically, they can maintain anonymity, except for maybe a list of people who have paid money.
I love the concept. It's really unique. I think the per-page cost is a bit high, especially given lack of editing. I think editing ability should be the first bridge to cross, even if it's really crude like delete-and-replace.
Agree with you, but the CC fee's are like 26% @ €1 (at least here in the EU with stripe) - so around $0.50 would be more 'fun' but I can see why it's $1.
"Very rarely do you need to update a page once it's been posted so we punted on that feature for now." Uh... okay.
Hope you can edit the page :)
While the use doesn't need to enter their cardholder name, their card details, ip address and any reference numbers can be tracked in Stripe's dashboard (Payment method info, Risk Insights, Related Payments).
While scheme payments are never truely anonymous, an approach you could use would be to tokenize card holder data and charge it to various linked PSPs. Such an approach would avoid all payments to one provider and obfuscate the user's ip address (since you are doing a server-to-server integration). Such a solution would typically add ~4c to your transaction costs.
What are you using for the richttext editor? Works very well!