The Rune Programming Language

Post by rad_gruchalski » Sun, Nov 27, 2022, 9:46 AM UTC

memorable wrote: post #31

pieshop wrote: post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

Quoted post unavailable.

Post by ithkuil » Sun, Nov 27, 2022, 9:47 AM UTC

throwawaybutwhy wrote: post #11

threatofrain wrote: post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Even if there aren't, it makes sense to clarify to media that this is an open source project made without any business commitments. I've seen other businesses do something similar; internally it reduces friction with the business admin when devs want to open source something.

_without any business commitments_ - not to sound trite, but when is the last time Google stood by its commitments?

Post by 867-5309 » Sun, Nov 27, 2022, 9:52 AM UTC

pieshop wrote: post #35

rad_gruchalski wrote: post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

Quoted post unavailable.

Post by sieabahlpark » Sun, Nov 27, 2022, 9:54 AM UTC

subtra3t wrote: post #25

FreeFull wrote: post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There already was a GO programming language before Google decided to use the name, too.

That doesn't justify them choosing an already chosen name now, does it?

Post by auggierose » Sun, Nov 27, 2022, 9:59 AM UTC