Live data from Hacker News

What's a good Linux terminal emulator that doesn't try to reinvent TMUX?

news.ycombinator.com

11–20 of 57 posts

Re: What's a good Linux terminal emulator that doesn't try to reinvent TMUX?

#13
Konsole is faster than Alacritty, but much easier to configure.

uxterm is the fastest.

    Latency in milliseconds

    Program    mean  std  min   90%   max
    uxterm     1.7   0.3  0.7   2     2.4
    mlterm     1.8   0.3  0.7   2.2   2.5
    Konsole    13.4  1.2  11.5  15    16.1
    Alacritty  15.1  1.2  12.8  15.9  26.3

Re: What's a good Linux terminal emulator that doesn't try to reinvent TMUX?

#15

Konsole is faster than Alacritty, but much easier to configure. uxterm is the fastest. Latency in milliseconds Program mean std min 90% max uxterm 1.7 0.3 0.7 2 2.4 mlterm 1.8 0.3 0.7 2.2 2.5 Konsole 13.4 1.2 11.5 15 16.1 Alacritty 15.1 1.2 12.8 15.9 26.3

Those Alacritty numbers look an awful lot like reporting framerate tuning rather than underlying performance (16.6ms latency being one frame at 60hz).

Re: What's a good Linux terminal emulator that doesn't try to reinvent TMUX?

#17
In some sense it's not a good terminal emulator (I hit several glitches in it on macOS, though it seems to do better on my NixOS machine), but I'm in love with cool-retro-term for its gorgeous CRT-style visuals.

https://github.com/Swordfish90/cool-retro-term

I mention it because it doesn't have tabs, saved sessions, or any of the other features tmux handles.

So, it's not a bad fit for heavy tmux users.

Re: What's a good Linux terminal emulator that doesn't try to reinvent TMUX?

#19
A terminal emulator is a high-value large attack surface that any hacker worth his salt would love to get into the supply chain. Therefore, unless your Unix machines are toys, it's a good idea to stick to reputable and well-maintained software, and for me that means what's in the distro's default repos. Every time you add third-party gunk you open yourself up to exploits from God knows where.
Post reply on HN