Live data from Hacker News

Google to lay off 10k “poor performers”

independent.co.uk

141–144 of 144 posts

Re: Google to lay off 10k “poor performers”

#141
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Were they happy, or did they just appear so? Some places punish employees that don't act unnaturally friendly and happy.

How often do you see your driver directly? I see them frequently because I'm often outside.

Once every couple weeks or so, I'm home a lot.

They don't _look_ that miserable, but they also don't look like they get any breaks or free time. They're always on the verge of running.

Re: Google to lay off 10k “poor performers”

#142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How often do you see your driver directly? I see them frequently because I'm often outside.

Once every couple weeks or so, I'm home a lot. They don't _look_ that miserable, but they also don't look like they get any breaks or free time. They're always on the verge of running.

Kind of like workers at fast food restaurants? I would say so. Sometimes they are happy, sometimes it's just a job.

Re: Google to lay off 10k “poor performers”

#143

It’s been eye opening to see Google, FAANG, et al to gradually be transformed from the “rebel” to basically the core of corporate America - with the corresponding structures and incentives they once said to have despised. Early on, they set out to keep the “startup” culture internally - to drive ongoing innovation. But it turns out that this requires a tremendous amount of both trust and capital to waste to do at sca…

While I think a lot of their culture has definitely changed, which makes sense given their size, the much bigger difference over the last 10 years has actually been the media's take on Big Tech.

Around 2015, there was a very noticeable shift in almost all media from liking tech companies to being super anti tech companies.

Re: Google to lay off 10k “poor performers”

#144

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Was it leaked as "poor performers" (absolute), or "lower performers" (relative)? Relative would imply they have good skills, but don't meet Google's extreme requirements.

Downvoted because I didn't put "extreme" in quotes? Or because Google is nowhere near being truly "hardcore"?

The NBA has extreme requirements. You can be an incredibly talented athlete and not be in the NBA. If you bring have what it takes you are out.

At Google, or any large company, there are plenty of people who for various reasons just aren’t good performers but don’t get cut. The requirements to stay on there are not “extreme”.

Post reply on HN