Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is there anyway I can find out the differences between two gogs and gitea?
https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/comparison/
Forgejo – Launching a Fork of Gitea
41–50 of 82 posts
Re: Forgejo – Launching a Fork of Gitea
#42While the seeming lack of communication from the Gitea owners (see the Gitea open letter) is a bit worrying, it does seem a bit premature to fork and potentially fragment the community before they've actually done anything.
Today the for-profit company released a code dump for the implementation of an integrated CI/CD server. This was worked on in secret for months by multiple people with no say from the community. Gitea should work with Woodpecker for closer integration, not build one by itself. There is no incentive for the company to support alternative CI/CD
Personaly, i have been request CI/CD support for half year due to there is no artifact in drone or woodpeeker.
Re: Forgejo – Launching a Fork of Gitea
#43Esperanto name is a strange choice. Is it a result of voting in community?
Re: Forgejo – Launching a Fork of Gitea
#44Hard to pronounce name sounds already like a bad start.
It's easy \ˈfor.d͡ʒe.jo\ the Esperanto word for forge
And English being the mess that it is, it has multiple pronunciations itself.
So It is a bit of a messy name, tho I appreciate I can read it with the Italian interpretation of those.
Re: Forgejo – Launching a Fork of Gitea
#45This is interesting but does codeberg dictate what projects are acceptable? From this post it seems that codeberg has an authoritarian vibe to the point where you can produce “wrong code”; https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/794#issuecomm... If that is the case I’ll stick with my self hosted gitlab.
Re: Forgejo – Launching a Fork of Gitea
#46This is interesting but does codeberg dictate what projects are acceptable? From this post it seems that codeberg has an authoritarian vibe to the point where you can produce “wrong code”; https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/794#issuecomm... If that is the case I’ll stick with my self hosted gitlab.
A platform needs to be moderated, and I support Codeberg. Ddevault and SourceHut already banned all cryptocurrency-related projects.
Re: Forgejo – Launching a Fork of Gitea
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's easy \ˈfor.d͡ʒe.jo\ the Esperanto word for forge
… unless your first language is very different from Esperanto. It really does sound weird. I already imagine trying to sell this at my $DAYJOB (I would likely have to "fork" it myself just to replace a few strings in the codebase that mention the original name).
Re: Forgejo – Launching a Fork of Gitea
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
A platform needs to be moderated, and I support Codeberg. Ddevault and SourceHut already banned all cryptocurrency-related projects.
What does SourceHut have to do with anything ? Are you planning to include cryptocurrency functionality in this fork?
Re: Forgejo – Launching a Fork of Gitea
#49Re: Forgejo – Launching a Fork of Gitea
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sorry, why should they work with Woodpecker? I like the project, but options are generally good. For example, Why work on Woodpecker? Why not Jenkins?
It is easy to use, and Codeberg uses it for their public CI/CD
> Gitea should work with Woodpecker for closer integration, not build one by itself.
> Codeberg uses it for their public CI/CD
Why should anyone care/use CI/CD software because Codeberg uses it? I didn't even know this company existed until just now. Isn't it rude to act entitled and act companies to bend to your will? You speak negatively of Gitea, highlighting a fork because they were working on a CI, but recommend Woodpecker which itself is a fork of Drone CI. What's your line of thinking here?