Google to lay off 10k “poor performers”
independent.co.uk
Google to lay off 10k “poor performers”
1–10 of 144 posts
Re: Google to lay off 10k “poor performers”
#2Source?
Re: Google to lay off 10k “poor performers”
#3the link doesn't reach anywhere for me.
Re: Google to lay off 10k “poor performers”
#4Re: Google to lay off 10k “poor performers”
#5Source?
Probably Blind lol
Re: Google to lay off 10k “poor performers”
#6Source?
[deleted]
Re: Google to lay off 10k “poor performers”
#7It’s incredibly shitty to telegraph to other employers that all the people you’re about to layoff are damaged goods. Completely unnecessary.
Re: Google to lay off 10k “poor performers”
#8BREAKING: 6% of workforce will be ranked in the sixth percentile.
This “news” is from back in May when the new performance management system buckets were released.
Re: Google to lay off 10k “poor performers”
#9It’s incredibly shitty to telegraph to other employers that all the people you’re about to layoff are damaged goods. Completely unnecessary.
When you are the size of Google I’m not sure how to tell managers across the company to assess poor performers and _not_ have it leak to the press. It’s not like this is a company press release.
Re: Google to lay off 10k “poor performers”
#10It’s incredibly shitty to telegraph to other employers that all the people you’re about to layoff are damaged goods. Completely unnecessary.
With the exception of companies going under or closing divisions or departments what kind of companies shave off “high performers”? Sure some high performers could erroneously slip trough but the intent is predominantly to lay off poor performers (sometimes high earners or older employees, but not usually)