Live data from Hacker News

Congressmembers Tried to Stop the SEC’s Inquiry into FTX

prospect.org

61–70 of 115 posts

Re: Congressmembers Tried to Stop the SEC’s Inquiry into FTX

#61

The eight congressmen: Tom Emmer (R-MN) Warren Davidson (R-OH) Byron Donalds (R-FL) Ted Budd (R-NC) Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) Jake Auchincloss (D-MA) Ritchie Torres (D-NY) Darren Soto (D-FL) The signed letter: https://emmer.house.gov/_cache/files/0/c/0c7fc863-7916-4b19-...

How much was donated to them versus other senators?

[deleted]

Re: Congressmembers Tried to Stop the SEC’s Inquiry into FTX

#62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

>EDIT: lol heaven forbid you propose smaller government with legitimate facts on HN lest you get downvoted How would smaller government have helped the FTX situation rather than make things like that much more common and worse? >The fact that the greatest investor in the US is Nancy Pelosi, AND she actively prevented legislation limiting insider trading by US Congress Members, should tell you that the government is n…

> How would smaller government have helped the FTX situation rather than make things like that much more common and worse?

What FTX situation? I have not given a cent to FTX, my kids have not given a cent to FTX, nobody I personally know have lost anything with FTX. More regulation (which in this case I don’t need) will cost me money spent to enable and enforce it.

Now, exactly what regulations we need to prevent companies from spending customers’ money on executive homes? All regulation you need to prevent this is on the books for some hundred years.

Re: Congressmembers Tried to Stop the SEC’s Inquiry into FTX

#63

In March . And not FTX specifically, but crypto in general. So, as d1str0 said, yes, very inflamatory (and misleading) headline.

The headline is still accurate, as stopping SEC inquiry in crypto would have the same effect.

Accurate maybe, but very imprecise.

Re: Congressmembers Tried to Stop the SEC’s Inquiry into FTX

#65

In March . And not FTX specifically, but crypto in general. So, as d1str0 said, yes, very inflamatory (and misleading) headline.

The headline is still accurate, as stopping SEC inquiry in crypto would have the same effect.

Would an inquiry in March have prevented the FTX mess? Maybe. It would have been good to at least give it the chance.

But in the current situation, the headline reads like these 8 tried to stop an inquiry specifically into FTX after the collapse, which is totally not what happened.

Re: Congressmembers Tried to Stop the SEC’s Inquiry into FTX

#66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

Now, I understand that there are very valid logical supporting arguments for small government, but let me get this straight: In a situation where massive fraud was committed by a corporation because the government inaccurately blocked government oversight, your solution is to decrease the size of the government... presumably meaning the oversight never would have been attempted in the first place. Crypto is exactly w…

>the advocacy of a small government is exactly _more_ situations like FTX. Arguably not true. The presence of large government and pervasive regulation may behave like the bike helmet paradox (Where cyclists feel they are able to take more risk while wearing a helmet, and motorists drive more carefully around helmet-less riders). Smaller gov in this case may lead to individuals feeling less like the government has vetted xyz investment opportunity and therefore may feel a need to do their own due diligence more thoroughly.

Re: Congressmembers Tried to Stop the SEC’s Inquiry into FTX

#67
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Their parties should kick them out and replace them with more principled people.

This comment makes no sense in the context of America. I guess you're from a country with some sort of Parliamentary system where governments are formed when a party is elected? In America, parties aren't elected and don't form governments. Accordingly, an American political party cannot kick out a congressman, much less replace one. To remove a congressman requires a two third vote (from congress, not from a politic…

It still can be done for the next term. AFAIK there is no limit on terms and people stay in congress far too long for my taste.

Re: Congressmembers Tried to Stop the SEC’s Inquiry into FTX

#68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Now, I understand that there are very valid logical supporting arguments for small government, but let me get this straight: In a situation where massive fraud was committed by a corporation because the government inaccurately blocked government oversight, your solution is to decrease the size of the government... presumably meaning the oversight never would have been attempted in the first place. Crypto is exactly w…

>the advocacy of a small government is exactly _more_ situations like FTX. Arguably not true. The presence of large government and pervasive regulation may behave like the bike helmet paradox (Where cyclists feel they are able to take more risk while wearing a helmet, and motorists drive more carefully around helmet-less riders). Smaller gov in this case may lead to individuals feeling less like the government has ve…

[deleted]

Re: Congressmembers Tried to Stop the SEC’s Inquiry into FTX

#69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>EDIT: lol heaven forbid you propose smaller government with legitimate facts on HN lest you get downvoted How would smaller government have helped the FTX situation rather than make things like that much more common and worse? >The fact that the greatest investor in the US is Nancy Pelosi, AND she actively prevented legislation limiting insider trading by US Congress Members, should tell you that the government is n…

> How would smaller government have helped the FTX situation rather than make things like that much more common and worse? What FTX situation? I have not given a cent to FTX, my kids have not given a cent to FTX, nobody I personally know have lost anything with FTX. More regulation (which in this case I don’t need) will cost me money spent to enable and enforce it. Now, exactly what regulations we need to prevent com…

> What FTX situation? I have not given a cent to FTX, my kids have not given a cent to FTX, nobody I personally know have lost anything with FTX. More regulation (which in this case I don’t need) will cost me money spent to enable and enforce it.

"Empathy is the capacity to understand or feel what another person is experiencing from within their frame of reference, that is, the capacity to place oneself in another's position." [0]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empathy

Re: Congressmembers Tried to Stop the SEC’s Inquiry into FTX

#70
You know things are looking bad if out of the gazillions of $ FTX laundered into the DNC they front-run their "reports" with the handful Republicans which were allowed to nibble at the trough.

Meanwhile, SBF is still not in jail and on the contrary even invited to speak: https://twitter.com/andrewrsorkin/status/1595517635441090565

Post reply on HN