maps.google.com now redirects to google.com/maps
11–20 of 396 posts
Re: maps.google.com now redirects to google.com/maps
#12Also a great way to share cookies, avoid CORS, and probably a zillion other complexities that result from running on multiple subdomains.
Re: maps.google.com now redirects to google.com/maps
#13Re: maps.google.com now redirects to google.com/maps
#14Also a great way to share cookies, avoid CORS, and probably a zillion other complexities that result from running on multiple subdomains.
Yeah, but do you want to bet that during the management call and the subsequent engineering call that made this decision, the main topic of discussion was the direct financial benefit from improved tracking? We'll never know, but if we could find out, say 1 year from now, I'd bet 100:1 that was the main driver.
Re: maps.google.com now redirects to google.com/maps
#15Re: maps.google.com now redirects to google.com/maps
#16Re: maps.google.com now redirects to google.com/maps
#17huh? You were always able to share sub-domain cookies with top-level domain cookies no? Set-Cookie: name=value; domain=google.com
Re: maps.google.com now redirects to google.com/maps
#18It's a very strange move indeed. maps.google.com implies an application lives there, far better than being on the root domain. It also means that when you start typing maps.google, you'd get all your history searchable related to maps, although arguably that's useless. I can't think of a reason why this would be a good technical move for Google (ignoring the don't do evil thingie), other than simplifying... certifica…
More possibility for connection re-use, as you'd only need to have a connection open for www.google.com, not one for each service.
And security wise: ISPs can now only see that you're accessing something at google, but not which service exactly. If they also bring in accounts.google.com into the fold, that would make it harder to see whether you have an account or not.
Re: maps.google.com now redirects to google.com/maps
#19Google maps is pretty much one of the only Google products that I still actively use. It's funny that this article was written and published today, since I had noticed the exact same thing yesterday! Does anyone know when it first started?